niman

As of June 11, 2020, at 8:30 PM, the total of laboratory-confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases reported among Connecticut residents is 44689; including 42788 laboratory-confirmed and 1901 probable cases. Two hundred forty-four patients are currently hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. There have been 4159 COVID-19-associated deaths. Overall Summary Total** Change Since Yesterday COVID-19 Cases 44689 +228 COVID-19-Associated Deaths 4159 +13 Patients Currently Hospitalized with COVID-19 244 -2 COVID-19 PCR Tests Reported 328353 +8309 **Includes confirmed plus probable cases COVID-19 Cases and Associated Deaths by County of Residence As of 06/11/20 8:30pm. Includes patients tested at the State Public Health Laboratory, hospital, and commercial laboratories. County COVID-19 Cases COVID-19-Associated Deaths Confirmed Probable Confirmed Probable Fairfield County 15561 617 1044 293 Hartford County 10455 648 1011 302 Litchfield County 1374 61 114 21 Middlesex County 1160 56 129 37 New Haven County 11606 373 889 145 New London County 1088 62 73 25 Tolland County 815 71 48 14 Windham County 446 7 13 1 Pending address validation 283 6 0 0 Total 42788 1901 3321 838 National COVID-19 statistics and information about preventing spread of COVID-19 are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/CTDPHCOVID19summary6122020.pdf?la=en

Filtered to: Louisiana 44,995 Cases Reported 2,883 Deaths Reported Tests Performed 26,670 by State Lab Commercial Tests 452,864 Performed Statewide Indicator Presumed Recovered* 33,904 as of 6/6/2020 Reported COVID-19 Patients in Hospitals 549 74 of those on ventilators http://ldh.la.gov/coronavirus/

Confirmed Cases 131,198 Confirmed Deaths 6,260 Total Tests Performed* 1,147,101 Recovery Rate** 93% *Total nucleic acid-based tests performed and reported electronically for testing of COVID-19 at IDPH, commercial or hospital laboratories. All numbers displayed are provisional and will change. ** Recovered cases are defined as persons with initial positive specimen collection date > 42 days who have not expired. Recovery rate is calculated as the recovered cases divided by the sum of recovered cases and deceased cases. Information regarding the number of persons under investigation updated on 6/12/2020. Information to be updated daily. http://www.dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/diseases-and-conditions/diseases-a-z-list/coronavirus Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Probable Cases and Deaths Probable Cases 861 Probable Deaths 181 Information regarding the number of probable cases and deaths updated on 6/12/2020 Information updated weekly

https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98163_98173---,00.html

https://www.health.pa.gov/topics/disease/coronavirus/Pages/Cases.aspx

https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Map?%3Aembed=yes&%3Atoolbar=no&%3Atabs=n

Discussion There was broad support for stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, and adherence to public health recommendations to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in early- to mid-May 2020. Most adults reported they would not feel safe if government-ordered community mitigation strategies such as stay-at-home orders and nonessential business closures were lifted nationwide at the time the survey was conducted, although a minority of these adults who did not feel safe wanted these restrictions lifted despite the risks. There was a significant association between age and feeling safe without community mitigation strategies, with younger adults feeling safer than those aged ≥65 years, which might relate to perceived risk for infection and severe disease. As of May 16, adults aged ≥65 years accounted for approximately 80% of reported COVID-19–associated deaths, compared with those aged 15–24 years, who accounted for 0.1% of such deaths (6). Identifying variations in public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs by respondent characteristics can inform tailored messaging and targeted nonpharmacological interventions that might help to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Other variations in attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs by respondent characteristics have implications for implementation of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and related prevention messaging. For example, a lower percentage of respondents in the U.S. survey cohort reported wearing cloth face coverings and self-isolating than did those in NYC and Los Angeles. However, although use of cloth face coverings in NYC and Los Angeles were similar, NYC experienced substantially higher COVID-19-related mortality during the initial months of the pandemic than did Los Angeles (4). Nationwide, higher percentages of respondents from urban areas reported use of cloth face coverings than did rural area respondents. Because outbreaks have been reported in rural communities and among certain populations since March 2020 (7,8), these data suggest a need for additional and culturally effective messaging around the benefits of cloth face coverings targeting these areas. Essential workers also reported lower adherence to recommendations for self-isolation, 6 feet of physical distancing, and limiting gatherings to fewer than 10 persons. These behaviors might be related to job requirements and other factors that could limit the ability to effectively adhere to these recommendations. Nevertheless, the high rate of person-to-person contact associated with these behaviors increases the risk for widespread transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and underscores the potential value of tailored and targeted public health interventions. The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, behaviors and adherence to recommendations were self-reported; therefore, responses might be subject to recall, response, and social desirability biases. Second, responses were cross-sectional, precluding inferences about causality. Third, respondents were not necessarily representative among all groups; notably a lower percentage of African Americans responded than is representative of the U.S. population. In addition, participation might have been higher among persons who knew someone who had tested positive or had died from COVID-19, which could have affected support for and adherence to mitigation efforts. Finally, given that the web-based survey does not recruit participants using population-based probability sampling and respondents might not be fully representative of the U.S. population, findings might have limited generalizability. However, this survey did apply screening procedures to address issues related to web-based panel quality. Widespread support for community mitigation strategies and commitment to COVID-19 public health recommendations indicate that protecting health and controlling disease are public priorities amid this pandemic, despite daily-life disruption and adverse economic impacts (5,9). These findings of high public support might inform reopening policies and the timelines and restriction levels of these mitigation strategies as understanding of public support for and adherence to these policies evolves. Absent a vaccine, controlling COVID-19 depends on community mitigation strategies that require public support to be effective. As the pandemic progresses and mitigation strategies evolve, understanding public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs is critical. Adherence to recommendations to wear cloth face coverings and physical distancing guidelines are of public health importance. Strong public support for these behaviors suggests an opportunity to normalize safe practices and promote continued use of these and other recommended personal protective behaviors to minimize further spread of COVID-19 as jurisdictions reopen. These findings and periodic assessments of public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs can also inform future planning if subsequent outbreak waves occur, and if additional periods of expanded mitigation efforts are necessary to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and save lives. Top Acknowledgments Survey respondents; Kinghorn Family Foundation; Australian-American Fulbright Commission; Mallory Colys, Sneha Baste, Daniel Chong, Qualtrics, LLC. Top Corresponding author: Michael A. Tynan, [email protected], 404-498-1202. Top

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is thought to be transmitted mainly by person-to-person contact (1). Implementation of nationwide public health orders to limit person-to-person interaction and of guidance on personal protective practices can slow transmission (2,3). Such strategies can include stay-at-home orders, business closures, prohibitions against mass gatherings, use of cloth face coverings, and maintenance of a physical distance between persons (2,3). To assess and understand public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs related to this guidance and COVID-19, representative panel surveys were conducted among adults aged ≥18 years in New York City (NYC) and Los Angeles, and broadly across the United States during May 5–12, 2020. Most respondents in the three cohorts supported stay-at-home orders and nonessential business closures* (United States, 79.5%; New York City, 86.7%; and Los Angeles, 81.5%), reported always or often wearing cloth face coverings in public areas (United States, 74.1%, New York City, 89.6%; and Los Angeles 89.8%), and believed that their state’s restrictions were the right balance or not restrictive enough (United States, 84.3%; New York City, 89.7%; and Los Angeles, 79.7%). Periodic assessments of public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs can guide evidence-based public health decision-making and related prevention messaging about mitigation strategies needed as the COVID-19 pandemic evolves. During May 5–12, 2020, a total of 4,042 adults aged ≥18 years in the United States were invited to complete a web-based survey administered by Qualtrics, LLC.† Surveys were conducted among residents of NYC and Los Angeles to enable comparison of the two most populous cities in the United States with each other and with the nationwide cohort (4). The nationwide survey did not exclude respondents from NYC and Los Angeles, but no respondent was counted in more than one cohort. Invited participants were recruited using methods to create panels representative of the 2010 U.S. Census by age, gender, race, and ethnicity (5). Overall, 2,402 respondents completed surveys (response rate = 59.4%); of these, 2,221 (92.5%) (United States cohort = 1,676, NYC cohort = 286, and Los Angeles cohort = 259) passed quality screening procedures§ (5); sample sizes provided a margin of error at 95% confidence levels of 2.4%, 5.7%, and 5.9%, respectively. Questions about the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic focused on public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs regarding stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, and public health guidance. Chi-squared statistics (threshold of α = 0.05) were calculated to examine differences between the survey cohorts and to examine potential associations between reported characteristics (gender, age, race, ethnicity, employment status, essential worker status, rural-urban residence, knowing someone with COVID-19, and knowing someone who had died from COVID-19). Jupyter Notebook (version 6.0.0; Project Jupyter) was used to conduct statistical analyses. Among respondents in the U.S. cohort (1,676), 16.8% knew someone who had positive test results for COVID-19, compared with 42.0% of respondents in NYC and 10.8% in Los Angeles (Table 1); 5.9% of respondents in the U.S. survey cohort knew someone who had died from COVID-19, compared with 23.1% in NYC and 7.3% in Los Angeles. Broad support for recommended COVID-19 mitigation strategies was found nationwide (Table 2). Overall, 79.5% of respondents in the U.S. cohort supported government-issued stay-at-home orders and nonessential business closures, whereas 86.7% in NYC and 81.5% in Los Angeles supported these measures. Further, 67.3% of respondents in the United States, 76.6% in NYC, and 69.1% in Los Angeles agreed that nonessential workers should stay home. The majority of respondents in NYC and Los Angeles and broadly across the United States agreed with public health guidelines, including recommendations for maintaining 6 feet of distance between persons (>87% in each area) and limiting gatherings to fewer than 10 persons (>82% in each area). At the time of the survey, most also agreed that dining inside restaurants should not be allowed, with agreement higher in NYC (81.5%) than in Los Angeles (71.8%) and in the United States overall (66.6%). Widespread adherence to recommended COVID-19 mitigation strategies was reported in all three cohorts. Overall, 77.3% of adults nationwide reported self-isolating,¶ with 84.6% reporting this behavior in NYC and 83.0% in Los Angeles. Most respondents (79.5%) in the United States also reported the behavior of always or often keeping ≥6 feet apart from others, with higher percentages reporting this behavior in NYC (85.7%) and Los Angeles (82.6%). Always or often avoiding groups of 10 or more persons was reported by >85% of adults in the three cohorts. Approximately 90% of respondents reported having been in a public area during the preceding week; among those, 74.1% nationwide reported always or often wearing cloth face coverings when in public, with higher percentages reporting this behavior in NYC (89.6%) and Los Angeles (89.8%). Overall, 84.3% of adults in the U.S. survey cohort believed their state’s COVID-19 community mitigation strategies were the right balance or not restrictive enough, compared with 89.7% in NYC and 79.7% in Los Angeles. As well, 74.3% of respondents in the United States reported they would not feel safe if these restrictions were lifted nationwide at the time the survey was conducted, compared with 81.5% in NYC and 73.4% in Los Angeles. In addition, among those who reported that they would not feel safe, some indicated that they would nonetheless want community mitigation strategies lifted and would accept associated risks (17.1%, 12.6%, and 12.7%, respectively). Reported prevalence of self-isolation and feeling safe if community mitigation strategies were lifted differed significantly by age, employment status, and essential worker status among adults in the U.S. survey cohort (Table 3). The percentage of respondents who reported that they were in self-isolation was highest among persons aged 18–24 years (92.3%) and lowest among those aged 45–54 years (71.5%). The percentage who reported that they would feel safe if community mitigation strategies were lifted was approximately twice as high among persons aged 18–24 as it was among those aged ≥65 years (43.1% versus 19.2%). Respondents who reported that they were essential workers** accounted for 47.2% of employed respondents in the U.S. cohort and were significantly less likely than were nonessential workers to report self-isolating (63.1% versus 80.6%). Essential workers were also significantly more likely than were nonessential workers to report that they would feel safe if COVID-19 community mitigation strategies were lifted (37.7% versus 23.7%). Reported prevalences of always or often wearing a cloth face covering in public and maintaining ≥6 feet of physical distance also varied significantly across respondent demographics and characteristics. Respondents who were male, employed, or essential workers were significantly more likely to report having been in public areas in the past week. Among respondents who had been in public areas during the preceding week, significantly higher percentages of women, adults aged ≥65 years, retired persons, and those living in urban areas reported wearing cloth face coverings. A significantly higher percentage of adults aged ≥65 years and nonessential workers reported maintaining 6 feet of physical distance between themselves and others and abiding by the recommendation to avoid gatherings of 10 or more persons than did others. Adherence to recommendations to maintain 6 feet of physical distance and limit gatherings to fewer than 10 persons also differed significantly by employment status and race, respectively, with employed persons less likely than were retired persons to have maintained 6 feet of distance and black persons less likely than were white or Asian persons to have limited gatherings to fewer than 10 persons.

Summary What is already known about this topic? Stay-at-home orders and recommended personal protective practices were disseminated to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the United States. What is added by this report? During May 5–12, 2020, a survey among adults in New York City and Los Angeles and broadly across the United States found widespread support of stay-at-home orders and nonessential business closures and high degree of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines. Most respondents reported that they would feel unsafe if restrictions were lifted at the time of the survey. What are the implications for public health practice? Routine assessment of public priorities can guide public health decisions requiring collective action. Current levels of public support for restrictions and adherence to mitigation strategies can inform decisions about reopening and balancing duration and intensity of restrictions.

Public Attitudes, Behaviors, and Beliefs Related to COVID-19, Stay-at-Home Orders, Nonessential Business Closures, and Public Health Guidance — United States, New York City, and Los Angeles, May 5–12, 2020 Early Release / June 12, 2020 / 69 Mark É. Czeisler1,2; Michael A. Tynan3; Mark E. Howard, MBBS, PhD1,2,4; Sally Honeycutt, MPH3; Erika B. Fulmer, MHA3; Daniel P. Kidder, PhD3; Rebecca Robbins, PhD5,6; Laura K. Barger, PhD5,6; Elise R. Facer-Childs, PhD1; Grant Baldwin, PhD3; Shantha M.W. Rajaratnam, PhD1,5,6; Charles A. Czeisler, MD, PhD5,6 1Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 2Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; 3CDC COVID-19 Response Team; 4University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 5Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 6Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Corresponding author: Michael A. Tynan, [email protected], 404-498-1202. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6924e1.htm?s_cid=mm6924e1_w#contribAff

AUDIO https-3A__www.cdc.gov_media_releases_2020_t0612-2Dcovid-2D19-2Dupdate.mp3&d=DwMGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=HzdBkMMldx5SuwmAhUAJEQHs65X9Md8K2zugQ-DZEuU&m=O42CQl-64aR88xJ9g-3lO8mjXWX31ZuVEYPgy7NVTWU&s=H_QdT76DBFk7vbuqNvM7NoREu4LqMX3ouIQctnkHCww&e=

Media Advisory For Immediate Release: Friday, June 12, 2020 Contact: Media Relations (404) 639-3286 Telebriefing Audio playstopskip-backwardskip-forwardvolume Volume Range Slider Scrub Range Slider What The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will provide an update to media on the COVID-19 response. Who Robert Redfield, M.D., CDC Director Jay C. Butler, M.D., CDC’s Deputy Director of Infectious Diseases and COVID-19 Response Incident Manager When 12:00 p.m. ET Friday, June 12, 2020 Dial-In Media: 800-857-9756 International: 1-212-287-1850 PASSCODE: CDC MEDIA Non-Media: 800-988-9459 International: 1-517-308-9146 PASSCODE: 2125064 Important Instructions Due to anticipated high volume, please plan to dial in to the telebriefing 15 minutes before the start time. Media: If you would like to ask a question during the call, press *1 on your touchtone phone. Press *2 to withdraw your question. You may queue up at any time. You will hear a tone to indicate your question is pending. TRANSCRIPT A transcript will be available following the briefing at CDC’s web site: www.cdc.gov/media. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/a0612-covid-19-update.html

https://www.mass.gov/doc/covid-19-dashboard-june-12-2020/download

Bergen County: 18743 Positive Test Results 1649 Deaths Hudson County: 18693 Positive Test Results 1246 Deaths Essex County: 18295 Positive Test Results 1728 Deaths Passaic County: 16581 Positive Test Results 988 Deaths Middlesex County: 16353 Positive Test Results 1070 Deaths Union County: 16351 Positive Test Results 1112 Deaths Ocean County: 9200 Positive Test Results 807 Deaths Monmouth County: 8660 Positive Test Results 662 Deaths Mercer County: 7295 Positive Test Results 515 Deaths Camden County: 6952 Positive Test Results 399 Deaths Morris County: 6556 Positive Test Results 632 Deaths Burlington County: 4848 Positive Test Results 350 Deaths Somerset County: 4736 Positive Test Results 433 Deaths Cumberland County: 2645 Positive Test Results 104 Deaths Atlantic County: 2453 Positive Test Results 172 Deaths Gloucester County: 2379 Positive Test Results 156 Deaths Warren County: 1200 Positive Test Results 138 Deaths Sussex County: 1150 Positive Test Results 149 Deaths Hunterdon County: 1034 Positive Test Results 66 Deaths Salem County: 699 Positive Test Results 56 Deaths Cape May County: 664 Positive Test Results 57 Deaths https://www.nj.gov/health/cd/topics/covid2019_dashboard.shtml

New Positive Cases 452 between 05/15/2020 and 06/11/2020 New Deaths 16 between 05/09/2020 and 06/11/2020 New Tests 8,019 between 04/07/2020 and 06/11/2020 Total Positive Cases 39,146 Total Deaths 2,214 Total Tested 335,18011.7% Positive https://www.coronavirus.in.gov/

37,519 Confirmed Cases 2,905 CDC Expanded Case Definition (Probable) 40,424 Total Cases 6,814 Number of Hospitalizations in Ohio 2,280 Confirmed Deaths 228 CDC Expanded Death Definition (Probable) 2,508 Total Deaths 1,745 Number of ICU Admissions <1-109 Age Range 49 Median Age 52%* Sex - Males 48%* Sex - Females https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/home

COVID-19 Statistics in Maryland Number of confirmed cases : 60,613 Number of persons tested negative : 339,482 Total testing volume : 473,271 Number of confirmed deaths : 2,773 Number of probable deaths : 127 Currently hospitalized : 836 Acute care : 505 Intensive care : 331 Ever hospitalized : 9,923 Released from isolation : 4,474 Cases and Deaths Data Breakdown: Parenthesis = Confirmed death, laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 test result Asterisk = Probable death, death certificate lists COVID-19 as the cause of death but not yet confirmed by a laboratory test NH = Non-Hispanic By County County Cases Deaths Allegany 187 (17) Anne Arundel 4,453 (183) 9* Baltimore City 6,559 (286) 8* Baltimore County 7,051 (390) 20* Calvert 370 (20) 1* Caroline 279 (2) Carroll 977 (100) 3* Cecil 435 (28) Charles 1,248 (80) 2* Dorchester 160 (4) Frederick 2,225 (107) 7* Garrett 10 Harford 991 (55) 3* Howard 2,332 (68) 5* Kent 189 (21) 1* Montgomery 13,348 (640) 39* Prince George's 17,042 (607) 24* Queen Anne's 179 (12) St. Mary's 575 (40) Somerset 78 (3) Talbot 107 (4) Washington 568 (21) Wicomico 1,004 (34) Worcester 246 (15) 1* Data not available (36) 4* By Age Range and Gender Age/Gender Cases Deaths 0-9 1,626 10-19 2,879 (1) 20-29 8,604 (14) 1* 30-39 11,321 (35) 5* 40-49 10,903 (85) 3* 50-59 9,670 (205) 10* 60-69 6,973 (444) 12* 70-79 4,450 (673) 18* 80+ 4,187 (1,281) 74* Data not available (35) 4* Female 31,531 (1,360) 71* Male 29,082 (1,413) 56* By Race and Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity Cases Deaths African-American (NH) 17,449 (1,140) 44* Asian (NH) 1,182 (104) 6* White (NH) 11,848 (1,176) 66* Hispanic 16,404 (284) 7* Other (NH) 3,105 (32) Data not available 10,625 (37) 4* https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/

https://covid19.ncdhhs.gov/dashboard/cases

https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/coronavirus/

Abbeville Rate (per 100k): 252.78 Positives: 62 Deaths: 0 Aiken Rate (per 100k): 131.68 Positives: 225 Deaths: 9 Allendale Rate (per 100k): 460.41 Positives: 40 Deaths: 3 Anderson Rate (per 100k): 151.07 Positives: 306 Deaths: 9 Bamberg Rate (per 100k): 284.37 Positives: 40 Deaths: 0 Barnwell Rate (per 100k): 258.79 Positives: 54 Deaths: 1 Beaufort Rate (per 100k): 281.07 Positives: 540 Deaths: 14 Berkeley Rate (per 100k): 151.82 Positives: 346 Deaths: 19 Calhoun Rate (per 100k): 185.53 Positives: 27 Deaths: 1 Charleston Rate (per 100k): 233.1 Positives: 959 Deaths: 15 Cherokee Rate (per 100k): 150.09 Positives: 86 Deaths: 5 Chester Rate (per 100k): 353.55 Positives: 114 Deaths: 1 Chesterfield Rate (per 100k): 615.55 Positives: 281 Deaths: 7 Clarendon Rate (per 100k): 963.11 Positives: 325 Deaths: 41 Colleton Rate (per 100k): 469.78 Positives: 177 Deaths: 16 Darlington Rate (per 100k): 514.88 Positives: 343 Deaths: 12 Dillon Rate (per 100k): 649.63 Positives: 198 Deaths: 4 Dorchester Rate (per 100k): 141.27 Positives: 230 Deaths: 3 Edgefield Rate (per 100k): 212.77 Positives: 58 Deaths: 2 Fairfield Rate (per 100k): 997.9 Positives: 223 Deaths: 20 Florence Rate (per 100k): 556.79 Positives: 770 Deaths: 43 Georgetown Rate (per 100k): 210.59 Positives: 132 Deaths: 3 Greenville Rate (per 100k): 501.2 Positives: 2,624 Deaths: 67 Greenwood Rate (per 100k): 365.76 Positives: 259 Deaths: 5 Hampton Rate (per 100k): 260.12 Positives: 50 Deaths: 1 Horry Rate (per 100k): 264.35 Positives: 936 Deaths: 33 Jasper Rate (per 100k): 179.56 Positives: 54 Deaths: 2 Kershaw Rate (per 100k): 629.59 Positives: 419 Deaths: 15 Lancaster Rate (per 100k): 234.67 Positives: 230 Deaths: 6 Laurens Rate (per 100k): 177.8 Positives: 120 Deaths: 4 Lee Rate (per 100k): 1,384.6 Positives: 233 Deaths: 19 Lexington Rate (per 100k): 351.13 Positives: 1,049 Deaths: 39 McCormick Rate (per 100k): 116.24 Positives: 11 Deaths: 1 Marion Rate (per 100k): 287.05 Positives: 88 Deaths: 5 Marlboro Rate (per 100k): 865.3 Positives: 226 Deaths: 3 Newberry Rate (per 100k): 241.94 Positives: 93 Deaths: 2 Oconee Rate (per 100k): 91.77 Positives: 73 Deaths: 0 Orangeburg Rate (per 100k): 358.57 Positives: 309 Deaths: 6 Pickens Rate (per 100k): 206.49 Positives: 262 Deaths: 4 Richland Rate (per 100k): 499.33 Positives: 2,076 Deaths: 71 Saluda Rate (per 100k): 771.75 Positives: 158 Deaths: 1 Spartanburg Rate (per 100k): 277.37 Positives: 887 Deaths: 37 Sumter Rate (per 100k): 543.47 Positives: 580 Deaths: 19 Union Rate (per 100k): 157.42 Positives: 43 Deaths: 0 Williamsburg Rate (per 100k): 902.27 Positives: 274 Deaths: 15 York Rate (per 100k): 206.42 Positives: 580 Deaths: 10 https://www.scdhec.gov/infectious-diseases/viruses/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/sc-testing-data-projections-covid-19

CASES 23,333 CONFIRMED 377 PROBABLE LAST 14 DAYS 6,275 CASES 86,581 TESTED TOTAL TESTED 286,008 DEATHS 764 CONFIRMED 5 PROBABLE HOSPITALIZATIONS Since March 13 2,202 STATEWIDE PRESUMED RECOVERIES Updated Weekly 13,508 STATEWIDE https://alpublichealth.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/6d2771faa9da4a2786a509d82c8cf0f7

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/96dd742462124fa0b38ddedb9b25e429

https://dph.georgia.gov/covid-19-daily-status-report

By LOS ANGELES TIMES STAFF UPDATED JUNE 11, 9:30 P.M. PACIFIC 143,400 confirmed cases +3,620 on Thursday 4,933 deaths +79 on Thursday The coronavirus pandemic has spread rapidly across California. Experts say the true number of people infected is unknown and likely much higher than official tallies. To better understand the spread of the virus, The Times is conducting an independent, continual survey of dozens of local health agencies across the state. What we know Tallies continue to climb. Over the past week, the state has averaged 2,921 new cases and 68.6 new deaths per day. The focus is shifting to SoCal. Los Angeles County has recorded 48% of new cases in the last two weeks, while home to only a quarter of the state's population. Hospitals are holding up. The number of patients has remained steady, a goal of the stay-at-home policies. Testing is increasing. Numbers are rising, but the state is still below its goal of averaging more than 60,000 tests per day. The highest toll is among seniors. Roughly 79% of the dead were 65 or older. At least 2,501 were living at a nursing home. The state has started to gradually reopen. Many counties are opening nonessential businesses. California's totals sit far below New York, where more than 30,500 people have died. California counties Alameda Contra Costa Fresno Imperial Kern Kings Los Angeles Monterey Orange Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Sonoma Tulare Ventura Other trackers Beach closures Housing homeless people Reopenings by county The lives lost More coverage Symptoms How it spreads Get our newsletter Jump to a section Trends Maps Hospitals Tests Demographics Nursing homes Reopenings State rankings The latest trends The number of cases in California is now on pace to double every 32.8 days, a number used to measure how quickly the virus is spreading. Coronavirus can infect people so rapidly that government officials have issued shutdown orders aimed at slowing the growth of new cases and flattening this line. CasesDeaths Cumulative cases Feb.MarchAprilMayJune020,00040,00060,00080,000100,000120,000140,000160,000 Times survey of county and local health departments Local governments announce new cases and deaths each day, though bottlenecks in testing and reporting lags can introduce delays. For instance, some agencies do not report new totals on weekends, leading to lower numbers on those days. New cases by day Feb.MarchAprilMayJune01,0002,0003,0004,0007-dayaverage7-dayaverage Deaths by day Feb.MarchAprilMayJune0501007-dayaverage7-dayaverage The lines above are seven-day averages. They offer a more stable view of the trend than daily totals. That's why experts wait for lines like these to flatten before they say conditions are improving. The rate varies from county to county, but most areas are still reporting new cases every day. The chart below is adjusted to show how quickly new cases are being confirmed in each county. A good sign is when a line flattens, which indicates that transmission is slowing in that area. Cumulative cases by county Current doubling time5 days7142130 15 dayssince 10th case30456075901020501002005001,0002,0005,00010,00020,00040,00060,000Doublingevery dayDoublingevery dayEvery2 daysEvery2 daysEvery3 daysEvery3 daysEvery weekEvery weekEverymonthEverymonthLos AngelesLos AngelesSacramentoSacramentoSan DiegoSan DiegoSanta ClaraSanta ClaraAmadorAmadorDel NorteDel NorteMariposaMariposaMonoMonoTehamaTehamaImperialImperialSutterSutterSan JoaquinSan JoaquinGlennGlennMontereyMontereyNapaNapaPlacerPlacerMercedMercedCalaverasCalaverasKingsKingsTulareTulareMendocinoMendocinoAlamedaAlamedaEl DoradoEl DoradoInyoInyoYubaYuba This chart tracks cumulative cases after each county confirmed its 10th case. Case counts are plotted on a logarithmic scale, which makes it easier to see when cases level off. Doubling rate is the estimate of how long it would take the county to double its number of cases, given the trend in the last week. Compare the slope of a county's curve to the slope of the guide lines to estimate its doubling rate at any point. Help us track the coronavirus by subscribing Your support makes our reporting possible. Get unlimited digital access today. Already a subscriber? Your contributions help us maintain this page. Thank you. Cases by county and city While initial outbreaks were centered in the San Francisco Bay Area, most new cases and deaths are now concentrated in Southern California. Officials are watching the latest figures as they weigh when and how to reopen. One metric is whether counties have kept new cases over the last 14 days to less than 25 per 100,000 residents. Currently, 29 of 58 counties pass the test. Metric CasesDeaths Time frame Last 14 daysCumulative Confirmed cases02204709801,8102,65018,330 Hover for more information. Los AngelesLos AngelesSan DiegoSan DiegoSacramentoSacramentoSan FranciscoSan FranciscoReddingRedding In the last 14 days Cases Per 100k Status Thursday Deaths Per 100k Thursday Los Angeles » 18,333 181.5 Failing +1,848 567 5.6 +50 Riverside » 2,659 111.6 Failing +329 66 2.8 +5 Orange » 2,091 66.1 Failing +250 62 2 +4 Imperial » 1,943 1,078.2 Failing +19 15 8.3 +2 San Diego » 1,854 56.1 Failing +161 50 1.5 +3 San Bernardino » 1,816 85 Failing +149 42 2 +2 Kern » 1,001 113.4 Failing +74 15 1.7 – Alameda » 984 59.9 Failing +87 12 0.7 +3 Kings » 984 655.7 Failing +36 3 2 – Fresno » 687 70.2 Failing +77 19 1.9 +2 Tulare » 636 138.1 Failing +43 17 3.7 +2 San Mateo » 512 66.8 Failing +19 11 1.4 – San Joaquin » 475 64.9 Failing +79 6 0.8 +2 Contra Costa » 423 37.3 Failing +31 6 0.5 +1 San Francisco » 401 46.1 Failing +31 4 0.5 – Ventura » 366 43.2 Failing +62 6 0.7 – Monterey » 350 80.8 Failing +23 3 0.7 – Stanislaus 346 64.2 Failing +49 5 0.9 – Santa Clara » 344 17.9 Passing +31 6 0.3 +2 Sacramento » 323 21.4 Passing +28 6 0.4 +1 Santa Barbara » 240 54.1 Failing +46 4 0.9 – Marin 221 84.9 Failing +13 3 1.2 – Sonoma » 141 28.1 Failing +30 – – – Placer 120 31.6 Failing +13 – – – Solano 115 26.2 Failing +26 2 0.5 – Merced 109 40.5 Failing +4 – – – Madera 84 54.2 Failing +10 1 0.6 – Napa 52 37 Failing +2 – – – San Luis Obispo 40 14.2 Passing +11 – – – Santa Cruz 34 12.4 Passing +10 – – – Butte 33 14.5 Passing – 1 0.4 – El Dorado 30 16.1 Passing – – – – San Benito 26 43.8 Failing +3 – – – Sutter 25 26.1 Failing +2 – – – Yolo 22 10.2 Passing +13 2 0.9 – Lake 11 17.1 Passing +1 – – – Mendocino 11 12.6 Passing – – – – Shasta 10 5.6 Passing +1 – – – Glenn 9 32.3 Failing +1 – – – Nevada 9 9.1 Passing +2 – – – Siskiyou 8 18.4 Passing – – – – Tehama 8 12.6 Passing – – – – Humboldt 7 5.2 Passing – 2 1.5 – Calaveras 6 13.3 Passing +4 – – – Yuba 5 6.6 Passing +1 – – – Del Norte 4 14.6 Passing – – – – Lassen 4 12.8 Passing – – – – Inyo 3 16.6 Passing – – – – Tuolumne 3 5.6 Passing +1 – – – Colusa 2 9.3 Passing – – – – Mono 2 14.1 Passing – – – – Trinity 1 7.8 Passing – – – – Alpine – – Passing – – – – Amador – – Passing – – – – Mariposa – – Passing – – – – Modoc – – Passing – – – – Plumas – – Passing – – – – Sierra – – Passing – – – – Show less Residents of cities, neighborhoods and regions all across the state have contracted the coronavirus. Here are the latest tallies for 888 places as released by county health departments. Confirmed cases 10 100 500 1,000 2,000 Counties that do not report cases by locality © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap Improve this map The following counties currently do not report cases by locality: Alpine, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne and Yuba Filter by countyAlameda Amador Butte Calaveras Contra Costa El Dorado Fresno Humboldt Imperial Kern Kings Los Angeles Marin Mendocino Merced Mono Monterey Napa Nevada Orange Placer Plumas Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Santa Cruz Solano Sonoma Stanislaus Tulare Ventura Yolo City/community Confirmed cases Long Beach 2,512 Castaic 1,644 East Los Angeles 1,489 Glendale 1,093 Boyle Heights 1,055 Pasadena 1,023 San Pedro 1,000 Panorama City 982 South Gate 979 Westlake 976 Sylmar 969 Wholesale District 965 Downey 949 Pacoima 940 Van Nuys 904 North Hollywood 871 Palmdale 867 Santa Clarita 864 Compton 863 Vernon Central 855 Lynwood 852 El Monte 812 Unincorporated - Florence-Firestone 805 Pomona 757 Reseda 729 Inglewood 727 Lancaster 719 Pico-Union 715 Huntington Park 704 Norwalk 673 Pico Rivera 665 Melrose 660 West Vernon 635 Central 600 Canoga Park 592 North Hills 576 Florence-Firestone 574 South Park 565 Bellflower 517 Montebello 514 Carson 511 Hawthorne 503 West Covina 490 Paramount 486 Vermont Vista 483 Bell 457 Baldwin Park 445 Burbank 431 Watts 430 Torrance 426 Harvard Park 418 Northridge 417 Bell Gardens 416 Whittier 415 Granada Hills 406 Temple-Beaudry 402 Maywood 399 Century Palms/Cove 391 Sun Valley 379 Wilmington 365 Koreatown 361 Winnetka 356 Willowbrook 342 Lincoln Heights 341 Gardena 337 Exposition Park 331 Arleta 324 Cudahy 318 Santa Monica 317 Hollywood 315 Wilshire Center 308 Athens-Westmont 300 Highland Park 298 West Adams 292 Tarzana 278 Sherman Oaks 277 Alhambra 266 University Park 259 Lakewood 258 East Hollywood 253 Azusa 247 Valley Village 245 El Sereno 240 Lake Balboa 240 San Fernando 235 Covina 231 Green Meadows 230 Little Armenia 224 South Whittier 222 Chatsworth 221 Silver Lake 221 West Whittier/Los Nietos 221 La Mirada 220 Vermont Knolls 217 Eagle Rock 213 Palms 211 Glassell Park 209 Monterey Park 208 Mission Hills 198 West Hollywood 198 Baldwin Hills 197 Woodland Hills 197 Hacienda Heights 193 La Puente 193 Downtown 188 Temple City 188 Hyde Park 185 Harbor Gateway 183 Monrovia 183 Little Bangladesh 180 Rowland Heights 180 Glendora 179 San Gabriel 179 Altadena 178 Walnut Park 176 Harvard Heights 172 Sunland 171 West Hills 171 Historic Filipinotown 170 Culver City 166 Valley Glen 159 Beverly Hills 155 Redondo Beach 154 Encino 151 Lawndale 151 Rosemead 151 Cerritos 149 South El Monte 149 Duarte 140 South Pasadena 140 Bassett 139 Harbor City 138 Lennox 137 Tujunga 137 Mid-city 134 Lakeview Terrace 133 Valinda 131 Mt. Washington 124 West Carson 121 Westchester 115 Country Club Park 113 Commerce 112 Arcadia 104 Rancho Palos Verdes 104 San Jose Hills 104 Hawaiian Gardens 103 Porter Ranch 103 Vermont Square 102 Crestview 97 Calabasas 96 West Los Angeles 96 East Rancho Dominguez 94 Hancock Park 94 Carthay 93 Santa Fe Springs 93 Mar Vista 92 Cloverdale/Cochran 91 Hollywood Hills 90 Del Rey 89 Unincorporated - Azusa 89 Brentwood 88 Crenshaw District 88 Studio City 88 Westwood 86 Diamond Bar 84 Gramercy Place 84 Manhattan Beach 84 San Dimas 80 Venice 74 Elysian Valley 72 Leimert Park 71 Alsace 67 Claremont 67 Unincorporated - Covina 67 Northeast San Gabriel 66 Victoria Park 66 Adams-Normandie 65 Echo Park 63 Pacific Palisades 60 El Camino Village 59 Jefferson Park 59 Los Feliz 59 Covina (Charter Oak) 58 La Canada Flintridge 56 Walnut 56 Atwater Village 54 Figueroa Park Square 54 West Puente Valley 54 Lomita 53 South San Gabriel 53 Artesia 50 Miracle Mile 47 Quartz Hill 47 St Elmo Village 47 Athens Village 45 Palos Verdes Estates 44 Signal Hill 44 Beverlywood 42 Beverly Crest 41 Avocado Heights 40 Century City 40 Malibu 40 South Carthay 40 Bel Air 39 Canyon Country 39 View Park/Windsor Hills 39 El Segundo 38 Hermosa Beach 38 Thai Town 38 La Verne 37 Stevenson Ranch 37 Agoura Hills 36 Cadillac-Corning 35 La Crescenta-Montrose 35 Little Tokyo 33 Playa Vista 33 La Rambla 32 Lake Los Angeles 32 Reseda Ranch 32 Wellington Square 32 Rosewood/West Rancho Dominguez 30 Chinatown 29 Longwood 29 Manchester Square 29 Santa Monica Mountains 28 Lafayette Square 24 San Marino 24 Sun Village 24 Unincorporated - West LA 24 East La Mirada 23 Littlerock/Pearblossom 23 Toluca Lake 23 Unincorporated - Monrovia 23 Val Verde 23 Cheviot Hills 22 Park La Brea 22 Angelino Heights 21 Ladera Heights 21 Wiseburn 21 Rancho Dominguez 20 Rancho Park 20 North Whittier 19 Del Aire 18 Unincorporated - Duarte 18 Acton 16 Elysian Park 16 Littlerock 16 Marina del Rey 16 East Whittier 15 Exposition 15 Marina Peninsula 15 Rolling Hills Estates 15 Sierra Madre 15 Unincorporated - Whittier 15 University Hills 15 Reynier Village 14 Industry 12 La Habra Heights 12 Shadow Hills 11 Unincorporated - Arcadia 11 Valencia 11 View Heights 11 West Rancho Dominguez 10 Agua Dulce 9 Harbor Pines 9 Regent Square 9 Unincorporated - South El Monte 9 Faircrest Heights 8 Kagel/Lopez Canyons 8 Rosewood 8 Sunrise Village 8 Toluca Terrace 8 Unincorporated - Hawthorne 8 White Fence Farms 8 Palisades Highlands 7 Twin Lakes/Oat Mountain 7 Westlake Village 7 Desert View Highlands 6 North Lancaster 6 Unincorporated - Palmdale 6 Irwindale 5 Unincorporated - La Verne 5 Bradbury 4 East Pasadena 4 Lake Manor 4 Pearblossom/Llano 4 Playa Del Rey 4 Saugus 4 Unincorporated - Pomona 4 Vernon 4 Elizabeth Lake 3 Hidden Hills 3 Leona Valley 3 Mandeville Canyon 3 Toluca Woods 3 Unincorporated - Glendora 3 Anaverde 2 Del Sur 2 Littlerock/Juniper Hills 2 Rolling Hills 2 Santa Catalina Island 2 Unincorporated - Angeles National Forest 2 West Antelope Valley 2 Bouquet Canyon 1 Hi Vista 1 Lake Hughes 1 Llano 1 Newhall 1 Pellissier Village 1 Roosevelt 1 San Pasqual 1 South Antelope Valley 1 Sycamore Square 1 Unincorporated - Del Rey 1 Show less Learn more about your county Explore the latest data by visiting our dedicated pages for Los Angeles, Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Imperial, Kern, Kings, Monterey, Orange, Riverside, Sacramento, San Diego, San Bernardino, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Sonoma, Tulare and Ventura counties. Hospitals and patients One goal of the state's stay-at-home mandate is to slow the virus in hope of preventing hospitals from being overrun. To keep tabs on capacity, the state health department tracks hospitalizations of confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients. All casesConfirmedSuspected Intensive care and other hospitalized patients AprilMayJune01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000 California Department of Public Health In order to reopen, counties must show that hospitalizations have stabilized, meaning that daily increases have averaged less 5% over a seven-day period, or that a county can’t have more than 20 hospitalizations on any single day over a 14-day period. Currently, 53 of the state's 58 counties pass the test. County ICU Other Total Status Los Angeles » 512 1,441 1,953 Declining Orange » 153 231 384 Stable San Diego » 151 211 362 Declining Riverside » 86 247 333 Stable San Bernardino » 92 155 247 Stable Alameda » 43 91 134 Declining Kern » 42 70 112 Climbing Fresno » 23 79 102 Stable Ventura » 17 83 100 Climbing San Joaquin » 21 62 83 Stable Imperial » 16 63 79 Stable Santa Clara » 21 41 62 Stable Sacramento » 18 44 62 Stable Sonoma » 7 55 62 Declining San Francisco » 14 36 50 Declining Tulare » 8 35 43 Stable Contra Costa » 16 27 43 Declining Stanislaus 15 26 41 Stable San Mateo » 9 31 40 Declining Solano 5 28 33 Climbing Kings » 10 21 31 Stable Santa Barbara » 6 25 31 Climbing Butte 9 21 30 Climbing Placer 4 19 23 Declining Monterey » 3 13 16 Stable Humboldt 1 14 15 Low Marin 3 8 11 Low Madera 3 8 11 Low Merced 3 4 7 Low Napa 1 5 6 Low Santa Cruz 0 6 6 Low Yuba 2 4 6 Low San Luis Obispo 2 3 5 Low Lake 0 2 2 Low Nevada 2 0 2 Low El Dorado 0 1 1 Declining Mendocino 1 0 1 Stable Shasta 5 – 1 Low Glenn 0 1 1 Low Inyo 0 1 1 Low Tuolumne 1 0 1 Low Trinity 0 1 1 Low San Benito 0 0 0 Low Sutter 0 0 0 Low Yolo 0 0 0 Low Siskiyou 0 0 0 Low Tehama 0 0 0 Low Calaveras 0 0 0 Low Del Norte 0 0 0 Low Lassen 0 0 0 Low Colusa 0 0 0 Low Mono 0 0 0 Low Alpine 0 0 0 Low Amador 0 0 0 Low Mariposa 0 0 0 Low Modoc 0 0 0 Low Plumas 0 0 0 Low Sierra 0 0 0 Low Show less Healthcare workers have been hit hard by the virus. Statewide 11,558 have tested positive as of Thursday, accounting for 8% of total infections. The number has continued to grow since state officials started releasing tallies. Confirmed cases among healthcare workers Feb.MarchAprilMayJune02,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,000State startsreleasing data California Department of Public Health Testing After a fitful start, Gov. Newsom has promised to dramatically increase coronavirus testing in the state. The governor’s goal is to reach at least 60,000 tests per day. Over the last week, an average of 59,282 tests have been conducted each day. New tests by day May 2May 8May 14May 20May 26June 1June 7020,00040,00060,00080,000Governor's daily goal California Department of Public Health As tests have become more widely available, a smaller share are coming back positive. That’s because more people without symptoms have been able to get tested, skewing the trend downward. In the last seven days, about 4.7% of the 414,976 tests conducted have returned a positive result. Positive test rate, seven-day average May 2May 9May 16May 23May 30June 60%2%4%6%8% California Department of Public Health Demographics While Californians of all ages have tested positive for COVID-19, deaths attributed to the virus have tilted heavily toward the elderly. Percentage of cases by age 0-1718-3435-4950-6465-7980+0%10%20%30%40%50% Percentage of deaths by age 0-1718-3435-4950-6465-7980+0%10%20%30%40%50% California Department of Public Health Among most age groups, and especially younger people, Blacks and Latinos are dying more often than other races relative to their share of the population. Percentage of population vs. deaths Age: All 0-17 18-34 35-49 50-64 65-79 80+ CasesDeaths 0%20%40%60%80%OtherBlackAsianWhiteLatino Race Deaths Deaths Pct. Population Pct. Latino 146 74.1% 41.5% White 14 7.1% 32.5% Asian 15 7.6% 17.5% Black 17 8.6% 5.9% Other 3 1.5% 2.1% Nursing homes Nursing homes are a tragic focal point of the coronavirus outbreak. At least 2,501 residents have died from COVID-19, 51% of the statewide total. CasesDeaths Deaths at nursing homes vs. elsewhere May 2May 9May 16May 23May 30June 601,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 California Department of Public Health California's Department of Public Health is currently listing 724 skilled nursing and 102 assisted-living facilities across the state with COVID-19 outbreaks. Filter by countyAlameda Butte Contra Costa El Dorado Fresno Humboldt Imperial Kern Kings Los Angeles Madera Marin Merced Monterey Napa Orange Placer Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Santa Cruz Shasta Solano Sonoma Stanislaus Sutter Tulare Ventura Yolo Residents Staff Facility Cases Deaths Cases Deaths AFFINITY HEALTHCARE CENTER 32 13 33 - ALAMEDA CARE CENTER 50 21 37 10 or fewer ALAMITOS BELMONT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - ALCOTT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - - - 10 or fewer ALDEN TERRACE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 106 21 36 - ALEXANDRIA CARE CENTER 46 22 27 - ALHAMBRA HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - ANGELS NURSING HEALTH CENTER - - 10 or fewer - ANTELOPE VALLEY CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ARARAT CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 16 - ARARAT NURSING FACILITY 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ARBOR GLEN CARE CENTER 54 10 or fewer 19 - ASTORIA NURSING AND REHAB CENTER 80 12 61 - ATHERTON BAPTIST HOME-SAM B. WEST - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - ATLANTIC MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE CENTER 38 10 or fewer 16 - AUTUMN HILLS HEALTH CARE CENTER 56 13 24 - ARARAT HOME OF LOS ANGELES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - ARBOR VISTA 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - ATRIA PARK OF PACIFIC PALISADES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - AVANTGARDE SENIOR LIVING OF TARZANA 16 10 or fewer 22 - BALDWIN GARDENS NURSING CENTER 18 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BAY CREST CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - BEACHSIDE POST ACUTE 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BEACHWOOD POST-ACUTE & REHAB 46 10 or fewer 18 10 or fewer BEACON HEALTHCARE CENTER 11 - 10 or fewer - BEL TOOREN VILLA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 202 10 or fewer 13 10 or fewer BEL VISTA HEALTHCARE CENTER - - - 10 or fewer BELL CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 51 27 29 - BELLFLOWER POST ACUTE - - 10 or fewer - BERKLEY VALLEY CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - BEVERLY WEST HEALTHCARE 17 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer BIXBY KNOLLS TOWERS HEALTH CARE & REHAB CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BONNIE BRAE SKILLED NURSING 17 10 or fewer 15 - BRIARCREST NURSING CENTER - - 10 or fewer - BRIER OAK ON SUNSET 12 10 or fewer - - BRIGHTON CARE CENTER 77 16 61 - BROADWAY BY THE SEA 62 15 34 - BROADWAY MANOR CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - BROOKDALE NORTHRIDGE - - 10 or fewer - BROOKFIELD HEALTHCARE CENTER 68 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BUENA VENTURA POST ACUTE CARE CENTER 69 15 22 - BURBANK HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER 65 16 33 - BURLINGTON CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 34 10 or fewer 17 - BELMONT VILLAGE ENCINO 24 10 or fewer 22 - BELMONT VILLAGE HOLLYWOOD 20 10 or fewer 17 - BELMONT VILLAGE RANCHO PALOS VERDES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BEVERLY HILLS CARMEL RETIREMENT HOTEL 15 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BEVERLY HILLS GARDENS CARE CENTER 12 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer BROOKDALE MONROVIA 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - BROOKDALE NORTHRIDGE 22 13 10 or fewer - CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER 51 11 46 10 or fewer CALIFORNIA POST ACUTE 24 10 or fewer 19 - CALIFORNIA POST-ACUTE CARE 43 10 or fewer 23 - CAMELLIA GARDENS CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer CANYON OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - CASITAS CARE CENTER 54 10 or fewer 36 - CATERED MANOR NURSING CENTER 22 10 or fewer 25 - CENTINELA SKILLED NURSING & WELLNESS CENTRE 23 10 or fewer 17 - CENTURY VILLA, INC. 65 11 38 - CHANDLER CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 26 10 or fewer 13 10 or fewer CHATSWORTH PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER 34 10 or fewer 27 - CHINO VALLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - CLARA BALDWIN STOCKER HOME 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 11 - CLAREMONT MANOR CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - CLEAR VIEW SANITARIUM - - 10 or fewer - COLLEGE VISTA POST-ACUTE - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - COLONIAL CARE CENTER 59 10 or fewer 31 - COLONIAL GARDENS NURSING HOME 75 10 or fewer 27 10 or fewer COMMUNITY CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COUNTRY MANOR HEALTHCARE 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA BAY VISTA HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA BELMONT HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA CLAREMONT HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA EAST NURSING CENTER 92 12 19 - COUNTRY VILLA LOS FELIZ NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA MAR VISTA NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 11 - COUNTRY VILLA NORTH CONVALESCENT CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - COUNTRY VILLA PAVILION NURSING CENTER 77 10 or fewer 22 10 or fewer COUNTRY VILLA REHABILITATION CENTER 24 10 or fewer 16 - COUNTRY VILLA SHERATON NURSING AND REHAB. CENTER 59 17 25 10 or fewer COUNTRY VILLA SOUTH CONVALESCENT CENTER 162 18 16 - COUNTRY VILLA TERRACE NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - 11 - COUNTRY VILLA WESTWOOD CONVALESCENT CENTER 10 or fewer - 16 - COUNTRY VILLA WILSHIRE CONVALESCENT CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COURTYARD CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - COVINA REHABILITATION CENTER 17 10 or fewer 22 - CRENSHAW NURSING HOME 10 or fewer - - - CULVER WEST HEALTH CENTER 39 10 or fewer 20 - CANYON TRAILS AT TOPANGA SENIOR LIVING 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - CARSON SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE 32 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - CITY VIEW LA, LLC 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - CROFTON MANOR INN 28 10 or fewer 16 - DEL AMO GARDENS CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - DEL RIO CONVALESCENT CENTER 29 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - DEL RIO GARDENS CARE CENTER 21 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - DESERT CANYON POST ACUTE, LLC - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - DOWNEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER 93 10 or fewer 36 - DOWNEY POST ACUTE 39 10 or fewer 19 - EAST LOS ANGELES DOCTORS HOSPITAL D/P SNF 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - EASTLAND SUBACUTE AND REHABILITATION CENTER - - 10 or fewer - EDGEWATER SKILLED NURSING CENTER - - 10 or fewer - EISENBERG VILLAGE 16 10 or fewer 24 - EL ENCANTO HEALTHCARE AND HABILITATION CENTER - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - EL MONTE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - EL RANCHO VISTA HEALTH CARE CENTER 46 20 19 10 or fewer ELMCREST CARE CENTER 41 10 or fewer 13 10 or fewer EMERALD TERRACE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 20 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer ENCINO HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER - - 10 or fewer - FIRESIDE HEALTH CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - FLOWER VILLA, INC. 18 10 or fewer 14 10 or fewer FOOTHILL HEIGHTS CARE CENTER 19 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - FOUNTAIN VIEW SUBACUTE AND NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - FOUR SEASONS HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTER, LP 95 12 53 - FALLBROOK GLEN OF WEST HILLS 19 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - GARDEN VIEW POST-ACUTE REHABILITATION - - 10 or fewer - GARDENA CONVALESCENT CENTER 36 10 or fewer 22 - GEM TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER 47 15 22 - GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER D/P SNF 23 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - GLENDALE HEALTHCARE CENTER 11 10 or fewer 11 - GLENDALE POST ACUTE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - - GLENDORA CANYON TRANSITIONAL CARE UNIT - - 10 or fewer - GLENDORA GRAND, INC. 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GLENHAVEN HEALTHCARE 18 10 or fewer 16 - GLENOAKS CONV. HOSPITAL 27 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - GOLDEN CROSS HEALTH CARE 66 10 or fewer 34 - GOLDEN LEGACY CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GOLDEN STATE COLONIAL HEALTHCARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE CENTER OF SANTA MONICA 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GRANADA HILLS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer GRANADA POST ACUTE 47 12 19 - GRANCELL VILLAGE OF THE JEWISH HOMES FOR THE AGING 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GRAND PARK CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 62 26 33 - GRAND VALLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - GREATER EL MONTE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - GREEN ACRES HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 15 - GREENFIELD CARE CENTER OF SOUTH GATE 37 10 or fewer 13 - GRIFFITH PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GUARDIAN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - GOLDEN ASSISTED LIVING 12 - 10 or fewer - GRANDVIEW, THE 18 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - HARBOR POST ACUTE CARE CENTER 33 10 or fewer 18 - HAWTHORNE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP 31 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - HERITAGE REHABILITATION CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - HIGH VALLEY LODGE 15 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - HIGHLAND PARK SKILLED NURSING & WELLNESS CENTRE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - HOLIDAY MANOR CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - HOLLENBECK PALMS 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - HOLLYWOOD PREMIER HEALTHCARE CENTER 29 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - HUNTINGTON DRIVE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - HUNTINGTON HEALTHCARE CENTER 22 14 18 - HUNTINGTON POST ACUTE 61 10 or fewer 23 - HYDE PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER 12 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - HEIGHTS AT BURBANK, THE 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - IMPERIAL CREST HEALTH CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE CENTER 51 10 or fewer 18 - INFINITY CARE OF EAST LOS ANGELES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 11 - INGLEWOOD HEALTH CARE CENTER 40 10 or fewer 15 - INLAND VALLEY CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER - - 10 or fewer - IVY CREEK HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE - - 10 or fewer - JOYCE EISENBERG KEEFER MEDICAL CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - JASMIN TERRACE AT EL MOLINO 65 15 24 - KEI-AI LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE CENTER 76 22 39 - KEI-AI SOUTH BAY HEALTHCARE CENTER 44 13 40 - KENNEDY POST ACUTE CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - KINGSLEY MANOR CARE CENTER 19 10 or fewer 20 - KENSINGTON REDONDO BEACH, THE 23 10 or fewer 22 - KENSINGTON SIERRA MADRE, THE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - KINGSLEY MANOR - - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer LA BREA REHABILITATION CENTER 11 10 or fewer 16 - LA CRESCENTA HEALTHCARE CENTER 19 10 or fewer 15 - LA HABRA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - LA PAZ GEROPSYCHIATRIC CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - LAKE BALBOA CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - LAKEVIEW TERRACE 33 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER 54 10 or fewer 47 - LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER 33 - 22 - LAS FLORES CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - LAUREL PARK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER 10 or fewer - - - LAWNDALE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - LEGACY HEALTHCARE CENTER 22 - 10 or fewer - LEISURE GLEN POST ACUTE CARE CENTER 23 10 or fewer 22 - LIGHTHOUSE HEALTHCARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - LIVE OAK REHABILITATION CENTER - - 10 or fewer - LOMITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - LONG BEACH CARE CENTER 56 10 or fewer 26 - LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE CENTER 29 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer LONGWOOD MANOR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - - LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - LOS PALOS POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER 24 - 10 or fewer - LYNWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER 41 13 29 - LAKEWOOD PARK MANOR 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - MACLAY HEALTHCARE CENTER 55 11 60 - MAGNOLIA GARDENS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 31 10 or fewer 15 10 or fewer MANCHESTER MANOR CVLT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - - - MARINA POINTE HEALTHCARE & SUBACUTE 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - MAYFLOWER CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - MAYFLOWER GARDENS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 21 10 or fewer 12 - MAYWOOD SKILLED NURSING & WELLNESS CENTRE 37 10 or fewer 32 - MEADOWBROOK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF GARDENA D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - MESA GLEN CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - MID-WILSHIRE HEALTH CARE CENTER 39 12 11 - MISSION CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - MONROVIA GARDENS HEALTHCARE CENTER 57 21 23 - MONTE VISTA HEALTHCARE CENTER 46 12 24 - MONTEBELLO CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - - MONTECITO HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP. 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - MONTEREY HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - MONTEREY PARK CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - - - MONTROSE HEALTHCARE CENTER 36 12 22 - MONTROSE SPRINGS SKILLED NURSING & WELLNESS CENTER 15 10 or fewer 12 - MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION HOSPITAL D/P SNF 17 10 or fewer 16 - MOUNTAIN VIEW CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 37 16 26 - MONTECEDRO 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - MUGUNGWHA SILVER TOWN 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - NEW VISTA NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 45 - 37 10 or fewer NEW VISTA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - NORTH VALLEY NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - - - NORTHRIDGE CARE CENTER 20 10 or fewer 11 10 or fewer NORWALK MEADOWS NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - NORWALK SKILLED NURSING & WELLNESS CENTRE 59 10 or fewer 33 10 or fewer OAKPARK HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - - OCEAN POINTE HEALTHCARE CENTER 33 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - OLIVE VISTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER - - 10 or fewer - OLYMPIA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 62 20 30 - OSAGE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE 25 11 10 or fewer - OAKMONT OF SANTA CLARITA 14 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - OAKMONT OF VALENCIA 15 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - PACIFIC CARE NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - PACIFIC PALMS HEALTHCARE 17 10 or fewer 15 - PACIFIC POST - ACUTE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - PACIFIC VILLA, INC. 50 10 or fewer 13 10 or fewer PACIFICA HOSPITAL OF THE VALLEY D/P SNF 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - PALAZZO POST ACUTE 22 - 12 10 or fewer PALOS VERDES HEALTH CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - PANORAMA GARDENS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 65 15 42 - PARAMOUNT CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - PARK AVENUE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTER - - 10 or fewer - PARK REGENCY CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - PARKWEST HEALTHCARE CENTER 29 10 or fewer 19 - PASADENA CARE CENTER, LLC 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - PASADENA GROVE HEALTH CENTER 41 10 or fewer 24 - PASADENA PARK HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 12 - PENN MAR THERAPEUTIC CENTER 18 - 10 or fewer - PICO RIVERA HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - PLAYA DEL REY CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 18 - PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - PRIMROSE POST-ACUTE 24 10 or fewer 19 - PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY SUBACUTE CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 14 - PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - PROVIDENCE ST. ELIZABETH CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING NORTHRIDGE 41 15 26 - PALMCREST GRAND RESIDENCE 15 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - RAMONA NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER 44 10 or fewer 26 - REGENCY OAKS POST ACUTE CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - RINALDI CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 25 10 or fewer 14 - RIO HONDO SUBACUTE & NURSING CENTER 26 - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer RIVIERA HEALTHCARE CENTER 87 11 24 - ROSE GARDEN HEALTHCARE CENTER 33 10 or fewer 34 - ROSE VILLA HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ROSECRANS CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ROYAL CARE SKILLED NURSING CENTER 11 10 or fewer 12 - ROYAL CREST HEALTH CARE - - 10 or fewer - ROYAL GARDENS HEALTHCARE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ROYAL OAKS MANOR - BRADBURY OAKS - - 10 or fewer - ROYAL PALMS POST ACUTE 10 or fewer - 13 - ROYAL TERRACE HEALTH CARE - - 10 or fewer - ROYAL VISTA CARE CENTER 31 10 or fewer 17 10 or fewer ROYALWOOD CARE CENTER 65 15 43 - ROSECRANS VILLA RESIDENTIAL CARE 14 - 10 or fewer - SAINT VINCENT HEALTHCARE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer SAN GABRIEL CONVALESCENT CENTER - - 10 or fewer - SANTA ANITA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 57 21 23 - SANTA CLARITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - SANTA FE HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - SANTA FE LODGE 17 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SANTA MONICA CONVALESCENT CENTER II 19 - 20 - SANTA MONICA HEALTH CARE CENTER 13 - 12 - SANTA TERESITA MANOR 16 10 or fewer 12 - SEACREST POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER 25 - - - SHADOW HILLS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 39 10 or fewer 27 10 or fewer SHARON CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - SHERMAN OAKS HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER 14 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SHERMAN VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CENTER - - 12 - SHORELINE HEALTHCARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - SIERRA VIEW CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - SKYLINE HEALTHCARE CENTER-LOS ANGELES 10 or fewer - 12 - SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARE - - 10 or fewer - SOLHEIM SENIOR COMMUNITY 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER 82 14 29 - SOUTHLAND 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - ST. JOHN OF GOD RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 21 - STONEY POINT HEALTHCARE CENTER 33 12 29 - STUDIO CITY REHABILITATION CENTER - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SUNNY VILLAGE CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - SUNNYSIDE NURSING CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - SUNNYVIEW CARE CENTER 23 10 or fewer 11 - SUNRAY HEALTHCARE CENTER 38 15 14 10 or fewer SUNSET MANOR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - SYLMAR HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER 41 - 33 - SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS 49 10 or fewer 17 - SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING – BEVERLY PLACE 57 13 33 10 or fewer SOLHEIM SENIOR COMMUNITY 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING OF STUDIO CITY 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - SUNRISE VILLA CULVER CITY 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - TARZANA HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER 75 10 or fewer 35 - TEMPLE CITY HEALTHCARE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - TEMPLE PARK CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - THE CALIFORNIAN - PASADENA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - THE CARE CENTER ON HAZELTINE, LLC 10 or fewer - - - THE EARLWOOD 33 10 or fewer 24 - THE ELLISON JOHN TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - THE GARDENS OF EL MONTE 27 10 or fewer 12 - THE GROVE POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER 43 12 17 - THE MEADOWS POST ACUTE 48 15 24 10 or fewer THE ORCHARD - POST ACUTE CARE 33 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - THE REHABILITATION CENTER OF SANTA MONICA 37 12 21 - THE REHABILITATION CENTRE OF BEVERLY HILLS 29 10 or fewer 35 - THE ROWLAND 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - TOPANGA TERRACE - - 17 - TORRANCE CARE CENTER WEST, INC. 55 12 17 10 or fewer TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER D/P SNF 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - UNIVERSITY PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER 22 10 or fewer 13 - VALLEY PALMS CARE CENTER 28 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - VALLEY VISTA NURSING AND TRANSITIONAL CARE LLC 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - VERMONT HEALTHCARE CENTER 14 11 24 - VERNON HEALTHCARE CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA - WEST LOS ANGELES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - VICTORIA CARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - VIEW HEIGHTS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - VIEW PARK CONVALESCENT CENTER 42 17 41 - VILLA ELENA HEALTHCARE CENTER - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - VILLA GARDENS HEALTH CARE UNIT 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - VILLA SCALABRINI SPECIAL CARE UNIT 10 or fewer - 12 - VIRGIL REHABILITATION AND SKILLED NURSING CENTER 21 13 20 - VISTA DEL SOL CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 14 - VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA – WEST LOS ANGELES 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - VILLA GARDENS 16 10 or fewer 26 - VISTA DEL MAR SENIOR LIVING 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - WELLSPRINGS POST-ACUTE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - WEST COVINA HEALTHCARE CENTER - - 10 or fewer - WEST COVINA MEDICAL CENTER D/P SNF - - 10 or fewer - WEST HAVEN HEALTHCARE 38 10 or fewer 12 - WEST HILLS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER 77 28 39 - WEST VALLEY POST ACUTE 62 21 22 10 or fewer WESTERN CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer 10 or fewer WESTLAKE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL - - 10 or fewer - WHITTIER HILLS HEALTH CARE CENTER 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - WHITTIER PACIFIC CARE CENTER 18 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - WINDSOR CARE CENTER OF CHEVIOT HILLS 53 10 or fewer 31 - WINDSOR CONVALESCENT CENTER OF NORTH LONG BEACH 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - WINDSOR GARDENS CONVALESCENT CENTER OF HAWTHORNE 14 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - WINDSOR GARDENS CONVALESCENT CENTER OF LONG BEACH - - 10 or fewer - WINDSOR GARDENS CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - WINDSOR GARDENS HEALTHCARE CENTER OF THE VALLEY 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - WINDSOR MANOR - - 10 or fewer - WINDSOR PALMS CARE CENTER OF ARTESIA - - 10 or fewer - WINDSOR TERRACE HEALTHCARE CENTER 39 10 or fewer 35 - WOODLAND CARE CENTER 12 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer WOODRUFF CONVALESCENT CENTER 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - WEST VALLEY ASSISTED LIVING 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - - WINDSOR HALL CARE HOME INC. 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer - YORK HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE 10 or fewer - 10 or fewer - Show less The state last updated the list on June 11. Officials have withheld the precise number where there are 10 or fewer cases. The totals are cumulative counts. Lives lost to COVID-19 Learn more about those we've lost by reading Times obituaries of Californians who have died from coronavirus. Reopening the state California is moving into the third stage of Gov. Gavin Newsom's four-phase plan to gradually reopen the state amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Newsom's roadmap for reopening Stage 1 March 19 - May 7 Strictest restrictions in place. Stage 2 Began May 8 Lower-risk businesses can reopen with social distancing guidelines. Advanced Stage 2: Retail and dine-in restaurants are reopened with social distancing guidelines Stage 3 June 12 Higher-risk businesses and venues (such as movie theaters and gyms) can reopen with social distancing guidelines. Stage 4 No date set Concerts, conventions and sports with a live crowd can reopen. All of California's 58 counties have moved into Stage 2, including Los Angeles County. No restrictions lifted All restrictions lifted Hover for more information. Los AngelesLos AngelesSan DiegoSan DiegoSacramentoSacramentoSan FranciscoSan FranciscoReddingRedding What's open in every county We're tracking what's open, closed and restricted throughout the state in ten different categories, including parks, retail, restaurants and more. Find out what's open where you live. Our state in context The coronavirus has hit most of the U.S., with the largest concentrations in and around New York City. California, America's most populous state, has one of the highest totals. It ranks much lower after adjusting for population. State Cases Per 100k New cases FewerMore New York 380,156 1,937.7 Mar 1Jun 10 New Jersey 165,346 1,861.6 California 139,780 357 Illinois 129,837 1,012.7 Massachusetts 104,156 1,524.9 Pennsylvania 81,316 635.7 Texas 80,777 289.7 Florida 67,371 327.1 Michigan 65,182 654.6 Maryland 59,465 990.5 Georgia 53,980 524.2 Virginia 52,177 620.1 Connecticut 44,347 1,238.2 Louisiana 44,030 944.1 Ohio 39,575 339.9 North Carolina 38,473 378.8 Indiana 38,337 577.6 Arizona 29,852 429.7 Minnesota 28,869 522.3 Colorado 28,484 515 Tennessee 27,930 419.9 Washington 24,354 333.9 Iowa 22,626 722.3 Alabama 21,989 452 Wisconsin 21,593 373.7 Mississippi 18,483 618.4 Nebraska 16,058 843 South Carolina 15,759 318 Rhode Island 15,756 1,491.2 Missouri 15,512 254.7 Utah 12,864 422.4 Kentucky 11,883 267.6 Kansas 10,750 369.6 Arkansas 10,368 346.7 Nevada 10,218 349.6 Delaware 10,056 1,059.1 District of Columbia 9,537 1,393.3 New Mexico 9,250 442.1 Oklahoma 7,483 191 South Dakota 5,604 648.4 Puerto Rico 5,329 157.3 New Hampshire 5,178 385.4 Oregon 5,060 124 Idaho 3,260 193.1 North Dakota 2,941 391 Maine 2,637 197.9 West Virginia 2,194 120 Vermont 1,095 175.2 Wyoming 980 168.4 Hawaii 685 48.2 Alaska 592 80.2 Montana 561 53.9 Show less No state has had more deaths than New York, though its pace has declined in recent weeks. State Deaths Per 100k New deaths FewerMore New York 30,542 155.7 Mar 1Jun 10 New Jersey 12,377 139.4 Massachusetts 7,454 109.1 Illinois 6,095 47.5 Pennsylvania 6,062 47.4 Michigan 5,955 59.8 California 4,854 12.4 Connecticut 4,120 115.0 Louisiana 2,968 63.6 Maryland 2,844 47.4 Florida 2,801 13.6 Ohio 2,459 21.1 Indiana 2,355 35.5 Georgia 2,329 22.6 Texas 1,905 6.8 Colorado 1,572 28.4 Virginia 1,514 18.0 Minnesota 1,267 22.9 Washington 1,176 16.1 Arizona 1,101 15.8 North Carolina 1,090 10.7 Mississippi 868 29.0 Missouri 851 14.0 Rhode Island 812 76.8 Alabama 744 15.3 Wisconsin 671 11.6 Iowa 631 20.1 South Carolina 575 11.6 District of Columbia 499 72.9 Kentucky 484 10.9 Nevada 449 15.4 Tennessee 437 6.6 Delaware 413 43.5 New Mexico 410 19.6 Oklahoma 356 9.1 New Hampshire 301 22.4 Kansas 240 8.3 Nebraska 191 10.0 Oregon 169 4.1 Arkansas 165 5.5 Puerto Rico 143 4.2 Utah 128 4.2 Maine 100 7.5 Idaho 85 5.0 West Virginia 85 4.6 North Dakota 73 9.7 South Dakota 69 8.0 Vermont 55 8.8 Wyoming 18 3.1 Montana 18 1.7 Hawaii 17 1.2 Alaska 11 1.5 Show less Tracking the coronavirus California counties Alameda Contra Costa Fresno Imperial Kern Kings Los Angeles Monterey Orange Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Sonoma Tulare Ventura Other trackers Beach closures Housing homeless people Reopenings by county The lives lost More coverage Symptoms How it spreads Get our newsletter About the numbers This page was created by Swetha Kannan, Casey Miller, Sean Greene, Lorena Iñiguez Elebee, Rong-Gong Lin II, Ryan Murphy, Melody Gutierrez, Priya Krishnakumar, Sandhya Kambhampati, Maloy Moore, Jennifer Lu, Aida Ylanan, Vanessa Martínez, Ryan Menezes, Thomas Suh Lauder, Andrea Roberson, Ben Poston, Nicole Santa Cruz, Iris Lee, Rahul Mukherjee, Jaclyn Cosgrove, Anthony Pesce, Paul Duginski and Phi Do. State and county totals come from a continual Times survey of California's 58 county health agencies as well as the three run by cities. Those figures are ahead of the totals periodically released by the state's Department of Public Health. State officials acknowledge that their tallies lag behind the updates posted by local agencies throughout the day and do not dispute The Times' method. The Times switched to using this method on March 18, leading to increases over what it had published previously using state data. The tallies here are mostly limited to residents of California, which is the standard method used to count patients by the state’s health authorities. Those totals do not include people from other states who are quarantined here, such as the passengers and crew of the Grand Princess cruise ship that docked in Oakland. In an effort to aid scientists and researchers in the fight against COVID-19, The Times has released its database of California coronavirus cases to the public. The database is available on Github, a popular website for hosting data and computer code. The files will be updated daily at github.com/datadesk/california-coronavirus-data. Closures and restrictions are drawn from an ongoing Times survey of county governments. National and global case data are collected by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and researchers at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering. If you see information here that you believe is incorrect or out of date, please contact Data and Graphics Editor Ben Welsh. https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-cases-tracking-outbreak/

https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/NovelCoronavirusOutbreak2020COVID19/DataDashboard