niman Posted December 18, 2024 Report Posted December 18, 2024 (edited) December 18, 2024-- A patient has been hospitalized with a severe case of avian influenza A(H5N1) virus (“H5N1 bird flu”) infection in Louisiana. This marks the first instance of severe illness linked to the virus in the United States. The case was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Friday, December 13. Since April 2024, there have been a total of 61 reported human cases of H5 bird flu reported in the United States. Partial viral genome data of the H5N1 avian influenza virus that infected the patient in Louisiana indicates that the virus belongs to the D1.1 genotype related to other D1.1 viruses recently detected in wild birds and poultry in the United States and in recent human cases in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington state. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2024/m1218-h5n1-flu.html Edited December 18, 2024 by niman
niman Posted December 18, 2024 Author Report Posted December 18, 2024 Media Statement For Immediate Release Wednesday, December 18, 2024, Contact: CDC Media Relations (404) 639-3286 CDC Confirms First Severe Case of H5N1 Bird Flu in the United States December 18, 2024-- A patient has been hospitalized with a severe case of avian influenza A(H5N1) virus (“H5N1 bird flu”) infection in Louisiana. This marks the first instance of severe illness linked to the virus in the United States. The case was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Friday, December 13. Since April 2024, there have been a total of 61 reported human cases of H5 bird flu reported in the United States. Partial viral genome data of the H5N1 avian influenza virus that infected the patient in Louisiana indicates that the virus belongs to the D1.1 genotype related to other D1.1 viruses recently detected in wild birds and poultry in the United States and in recent human cases in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington state. This H5N1 bird flu genotype is different than the B3.13 genotype detected in dairy cows, sporadic human cases in multiple states, and some poultry outbreaks in the United States. Additional genomic sequencing and efforts to isolate virus from clinical specimens from the patient in Louisiana are underway at CDC. While an investigation into the source of the infection in Louisiana is ongoing, it has been determined that the patient had exposure to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks. This is the first case of H5N1 bird flu in the U.S. that has been linked to exposure to a backyard flock. A sporadic case of severe H5N1 bird flu illness in a person is not unexpected; avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection has previously been associated with severe human illness in other countries during 2024 and prior years, including illness resulting in death. No person-to-person spread of H5 bird flu has been detected. This case does not change CDC’s overall assessment of the immediate risk to the public’s health from H5N1 bird flu, which remains low. This case underscores that, in addition to affected commercial poultry and dairy operations, wild birds and backyard flocks also can be a source of exposure. People with work or recreational exposures to infected animals are at higher risk of infection and should follow CDC’s recommended precautions when around animals that are infected or potentially infected with H5N1 avian influenza virus. This means that backyard flock owners, hunters and other bird enthusiasts should also take precautions. The best way to prevent H5 bird flu is to avoid exposure whenever possible. Infected birds shed avian influenza A viruses in their saliva, mucous, and feces. Other infected animals may shed avian influenza A viruses in respiratory secretions and other bodily fluids (e.g., in unpasteurized cow milk or ‘raw milk’). As a general precaution, whenever possible, people should avoid contact with sick or dead animals, in particular wild birds, and poultry. For individuals with direct/close contact with wild birds or sick or dead poultry or other animals, wearrecommended personal protective equipment (PPE). Wild birds can be infected with avian influenza A viruses even if they don't look sick. Do not touch surfaces or materials (e.g., animal litter or bedding material) contaminated with saliva, mucous, or animal feces from wild or domestic birds or other animals with confirmed or suspected avian influenza A virus infection. For more information on H5 bird flu in the U.S. and CDC’s response, including regularly updated case counts, visit theH5 Bird Flu: Current Situation page.
KbyU Posted December 19, 2024 Report Posted December 19, 2024 Bird flu found in SWLA backyard flock after person hospitalized They say is was a non poultry backyard flock. 1st person to have caught bird flu from a backyard flock. They aren't giving much information. People are worried about their chickens. The ducks and geese come down for the winter.
CoffeeLover Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 Is this information correct that came up on a Twitter X search? The H5 E190D mutation mentioned in the X post refers to a specific change in the hemagglutinin (HA) protein of the H5N1 bird flu virus, not the 1918 H1N1 influenza virus. To address your question, let’s clarify: The "E190D" mutation indicates a change from glutamic acid (E) to aspartic acid (D) at position 190 of the HA protein. This mutation is numbered based on H5-specific conventions, not the H3 numbering often used as a standard for influenza HA proteins. The 1918 flu was caused by an H1N1 influenza virus, a different subtype from H5N1. The HA protein in H1N1 (H1) and H5N1 (H5) differs significantly in structure and sequence, so direct comparisons of specific mutations like "E190D" across subtypes require alignment to a common reference (e.g., H3 numbering). In the 1918 H1N1 virus, a well-documented mutation at position 190 (in H1 numbering) was D190E (aspartic acid to glutamic acid), the reverse of E190D. This mutation was notable because it contributed to the virus’s adaptation from avian to human hosts, enhancing its ability to bind to human-type sialic acid receptors (α2,6-linked). Studies, such as those from the early 2000s reconstructing the 1918 virus, confirmed this change was present in the pandemic strain. However, the E190D mutation in H5N1 (as seen in the British Columbia and Louisiana cases) is a different context. In H5N1, E190D is associated with increased binding affinity for mammalian receptors, but it’s not a direct match to the 1918 H1N1 situation. The H5 HA protein’s sequence and receptor-binding site differ from H1, so the functional impact of E190D in H5N1 isn’t identical to D190E in 1918 H1N1, though both suggest adaptation toward mammals. To summarize: No, the E190D mutation was not in the 1918 flu. The 1918 H1N1 virus had a D190E mutation in its H1 HA protein, which played a role in its human adaptation. The E190D in recent H5N1 cases is a distinct mutation in a different subtype (H5), potentially signaling a similar worrying trend of mammalian adaptation, but it’s not the same as what occurred in 1918.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now