niman

Summary of COVID-19 cases by age group Case counts Case percentages Age Group (Years) Cases as of 5/6/2020 Ever hospitalized as of 5/6/2020 Any Intensive Care as of 5/6/2020 Deaths as of 5/6/2020 <10 115 7 0 0 10-19 325 15 1 0 20-29 1390 71 11 4 30-39 1492 114 20 4 40-49 1533 182 46 11 50-59 1591 293 80 32 60-69 1181 375 119 56 70-79 667 334 85 106 80-89 419 225 46 87 90+ 188 78 15 62 Total 8,901 1,694 423 362 https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/cases.htm

https://www.azdhs.gov/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/infectious-disease-epidemiology/covid-19/dashboards/index.php

There are 9,266 confirmed COVID-19 patients in Missouri, including 425 deaths. https://www.kshb.com/news/coronavirus/covid-19-case-tracker-where-we-stand-in-mo-ks-nationwide COUNTY COVID-19 Cases COVID-19 Deaths Adair County 12 0 Andrew County 6 0 Atchison County 2 0 Audrain County 1 0 Barry County 5 0 Barton County 0 0 Bates County 6 1 Benton County 8 0 Bollinger County 4 0 Boone County 98 1 Buchanan County 386 2 Butler County 26 0 Caldwell County 3 0 Callaway County 23 1 Camden County 35 1 Cape Girardeau County 49 1 Carroll County 2 0 Carter County 3 1 Cass County 66 6 Cedar County 7 0 Chariton County 5 0 Christian County 19 0 Clark County 1 0 Clay County 86 1 Clinton County 13 0 Cole County 53 1 Cooper County 9 0 Crawford County 8 0 Dade County 0 0 Dallas County 2 0 Daviess County 3 0 DeKalb County 3 0 Dent County 0 0 Douglas County 0 0 Dunklin County 23 2 Franklin County 132 13 Gasconade County 2 0 Gentry County 1 0 Greene County 99 8 Grundy County 0 0 Harrison County 6 0 Henry County 8 1 Hickory County 0 0 Holt County 1 0 Howard County 2 0 Howell County 5 0 Iron County 2 0 Jackson County 362 16 Jasper County 24 0 Jefferson County 293 10 Johnson County 60 0 Knox County 0 0 Laclede County 0 0 Lafayette County 50 2 Lawrence County 1 0 Lewis County 6 1 Lincoln County 51 1 Linn County 5 1 Livingston County 4 0 McDonald County 4 0 Macon County 2 0 Madison County 2 0 Maries County 2 0 Marion County 5 0 Mercer County 0 0 Miller County 2 0 Mississippi County 32 0 Moniteau County 42 0 Monroe County 0 0 Montgomery County 7 0 Morgan County 6 0 New Madrid County 11 0 Newton County 11 1 Nodaway County 5 0 Oregon County 2 0 Osage County 5 0 Ozark County 0 0 Pemiscot County 48 3 Perry County 44 0 Pettis County 55 0 Phelps County 2 0 Pike County 12 0 Platte County 36 0 Polk County 1 0 Pulaski County 36 1 Putnam County 0 0 Ralls County 1 0 Randolph County 8 0 Ray County 11 0 Reynolds County 2 0 Ripley County 5 0 St. Charles County 631 43 St. Clair County 2 0 Ste. Genevieve County 9 1 St. Francois County 29 2 St. Louis County 3,648 204 Saline County 208 0 Schuyler County 0 0 Scotland County 4 0 Scott County 76 2 Shannon County 0 0 Shelby County 1 0 Stoddard County 24 0 Stone County 3 0 Sullivan County 1 0 Taney County 12 2 Texas County 0 0 Vernon County 5 0 Warren County 28 0 Washington County 9 1 Wayne County 0 0 Webster County 15 0 Worth County 1 0 Wright County 10 0 St. Louis city 1,362 78 Kansas City 706 16 TBD 2 0

As of May 05, 2020, at 8:30 PM, a total of 30995 cases of COVID-19 have been reported among Connecticut residents. One thousand four hundred forty-five patients are currently hospitalized. There have been 2718 COVID-19-associated deaths. Day-to-day changes reflect newly reported cases, deaths, and tests that occurred over the last several days to week. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Hospitalization data were collected by the Connecticut Hospital Association. Deaths* reported to either the OCME or DPH are included in the daily COVID-19 update. *For public health surveillance, COVID-19-associated deaths include persons who tested positive for COVID-19 around the time of death (confirmed) and persons whose death certificate lists COVID-19 disease as a cause of death or a significant condition contributing to death (probable). Overall Summary Total Change Since Yesterday COVID-19 Cases 30995 +374 COVID-19-Associated Deaths 2718 +85 Patients Currently Hospitalized with COVID-19 1445 -55 COVID-19 Tests Reported 111447 +2804 COVID-19 Cases and Associated Deaths by County of Residence As of 05/05/20 8:30pm. Includes patients tested at the State Public Health Laboratory, hospital, and commercial laboratories. County COVID-19 Cases COVID-19-Associated Deaths Fairfield County 12455 952 Hartford County 6530 842 Litchfield County 1085 100 Middlesex County 742 98 New Haven County 8419 629 New London County 704 47 Tolland County 513 44 Windham County 242 4 Pending address validation 305 2 Total 30995 2718 National COVID-19 statistics and information about preventing spread of COVID-19 are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Coronavirus/CTDPHCOVID19summary5062020.pdf?la=en

Mississippi COVID-19 Case Map This map and the following table show total cases in Mississippi as of 6 p.m. May 5, 2020, and include all reported cases since March 11, 2020. https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,420.html#caseTable New cases reported today: 217 New deaths reported today: 32 (5 from Vital Records reports)* * MSDH identified an additional 5 confirmed COVID-19 related deaths between April 4 and April 23 among Mississippians through Death Certificate Reports. An interactive version of this case map is also available: View interactive Mississippi case map » About our case counts: We currently update our map and statistics each morning with test results from the previous day. Outside laboratories also report positive test results to us, which are included in our totals. County case numbers and deaths may change as investigation finds new or additional information. Mississippi COVID-19 Cases to Date Table of all total cases and deaths, and those in long-term care (LTC) facilities, since March 11, 2020. County Total Cases Total Deaths Total LTC Facility Cases Total LTC Facility Deaths Adams 154 10 33 4 Alcorn 10 1 0 0 Amite 32 0 1 0 Attala 159 3 38 3 Benton 12 0 1 0 Bolivar 115 8 16 2 Calhoun 57 4 23 4 Carroll 102 3 39 2 Chickasaw 83 9 25 6 Choctaw 14 2 0 0 Claiborne 33 0 0 0 Clarke 68 6 11 3 Clay 58 3 0 0 Coahoma 70 3 0 0 Copiah 137 1 2 1 Covington 82 0 0 0 Desoto 310 4 1 1 Forrest 273 17 23 9 Franklin 17 1 0 0 George 15 1 0 0 Greene 6 1 0 0 Grenada 41 2 14 2 Hancock 68 5 6 3 Harrison 187 6 1 1 Hinds 588 11 18 6 Holmes 176 12 27 3 Humphreys 27 4 7 2 Itawamba 65 6 32 5 Jackson 271 10 39 2 Jasper 66 2 0 0 Jefferson 26 0 0 0 Jefferson Davis 45 1 2 0 Jones 199 4 16 0 Kemper 80 6 19 3 Lafayette 96 3 36 0 Lamar 127 3 1 0 Lauderdale 448 40 111 25 Lawrence 61 0 1 0 Leake 257 2 0 0 Lee 73 4 5 0 Leflore 177 18 44 8 Lincoln 166 12 54 8 Lowndes 64 3 7 2 Madison 318 11 41 8 Marion 77 7 14 2 Marshall 49 2 0 0 Monroe 178 20 89 18 Montgomery 51 1 0 0 Neshoba 254 11 27 3 Newton 113 0 1 0 Noxubee 92 2 9 2 Oktibbeha 59 4 11 3 Panola 42 2 0 0 Pearl River 183 21 41 6 Perry 32 1 0 0 Pike 159 9 13 4 Pontotoc 22 2 4 0 Prentiss 33 2 20 2 Quitman 16 0 0 0 Rankin 226 6 6 0 Scott 410 3 9 1 Sharkey 5 0 0 0 Simpson 55 0 2 0 Smith 92 6 23 3 Stone 23 0 0 0 Sunflower 61 3 0 0 Tallahatchie 12 1 0 0 Tate 45 0 1 0 Tippah 61 10 0 0 Tishomingo 8 0 1 0 Tunica 37 2 12 2 Union 40 2 10 1 Walthall 36 0 0 0 Warren 90 2 11 0 Washington 80 3 4 1 Wayne 26 0 1 0 Webster 21 1 0 0 Wilkinson 72 7 5 2 Winston 53 0 0 0 Yalobusha 23 0 0 0 Yazoo 155 2 0 0 Total 8,424 374 1,008 163 The numbers in this table are provisional. County case numbers and deaths may change as investigation finds new or additional information about residence. Long-Term Care Facility Cases and Deaths by Race Long-term care (LTC) facilities like nursing homes are considered high risk locations because their residents are older or in poor health. Even one case of COVID-19 in these facilities among residents or employees is considered an outbreak. We investigate residents, staff and close contacts of infected individuals for possible exposure. (Long-term care facilities include nursing homes, intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities, personal care homes, assisted living facilities, long-term acute care facilities, and psychiatric or chemical dependency residential treatment centers.) View a table by county of Mississippi COVID-19 cases in long-term care facilities PDF Mississippi Cases and Deaths Tables Mississippi COVID-19 cases by county, race and ethnicity PDF Mississippi COVID-19 deaths by county, race and ethnicity PDF Interactive Map and Charts Our state case map is other data charts are available in interactive form. View interactive map View interactive epidemiological trend and syndromic surveillance View interactive hospitalization chart Trends and Summary Data The charts below are based on available data at the time of publication. Charts do not include cases where insufficient details of the case are known. Note: Values up to two weeks in the past on the Date of Illness Onset chart above can change as we update it with new information from disease investigation. Syndromic Surveillance Emergency department visits by those with symptoms characteristic of COVID-19, influenza and pneumonia, updated weekly. Estimated Recoveries Presumed COVID-19 cases recovered, estimated weekly (does not include cases still under investigation). U.S. and World Cases COVID-19 cases in the United States (CDC) U.S. COVID-19 Tracker (CDC) COVID-19 Global Case Map (Johns Hopkins University) COVID-19 Testing Statewide Combined Testing Summary COVID-19 testing providers around the state include commercial laboratories as well as hospital labs. Combined with testing done by the MSDH Public Health Laboratory, the figures provide a complete picture of all Mississippi testing. We will update these figures as data becomes available. Combined testing totals (MSDH, hospital laboratories and commercial testing providers) as of May 4, 2020. Total individuals tested by the MSDH Public Health Laboratory 13,367 Total individuals tested by other providers 66,941 Total individuals tested for COVID-19 statewide 80,308 MSDH Testing Summary MSDH Public Health Laboratory (MPHL) testing totals as of 6 p.m., May 5, 2020. These totals are for tests performed at the MPHL only. Total individuals tested by the MPHL: 13,461 Total positive individuals from MPHL tests: 1,635

Total COVID-19 Positive 10,205 Source: RIDOH COVID-19 Fatalities 370 Source: RIDOH Newly Reported Fatalities 15 Source: RIDOH Total Covid-19 Tests 79,373 Source: RIDOH Covid-19 Negative 69,168 Source: RIDOH Newly Reported Positive Tests 272 Source: RIDOH Currently Hospitalized 324 Source: RIDOH Currently in ICU 86 Source: RIDOH Currently on Vent 60 Source: RIDOH https://ri-department-of-health-covid-19-data-rihealth.hub.arcgis.com/

Updated daily by 11 a.m. Last updated 10:45 a.m., May 6, 2020. https://www.ncdhhs.gov/divisions/public-health/covid19/covid-19-nc-case-count#nc-counties-with-cases Laboratory-Confirmed Cases Deaths Completed Tests Currently Hospitalized Number of Counties 12,758 477 164,482 516 99 Knowing when to dial up or down social distancing and other protections depends on two factors: our Trends in key metrics, and our capacity to conduct Testing and Tracing. Governor Cooper and Secretary Cohen announced a combination of key metrics that North Carolina is watching to inform decisions to ease restrictions. These key metrics are included below. Laboratory-Confirmed Cases reflect cases that were tested and returned positive, including the NC State Laboratory of Public Health and reporting hospital and commercial labs. All data are preliminary. Not all cases of COVID-19 are tested, so this does not represent the total number of people in North Carolina who have or had COVID-19. Deaths reflect deaths in persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 reported by local health departments to the NC Department of Health and Human Services. Completed tests reflect testing completed by the NC State Laboratory of Public Health and reporting hospital and commercial labs.

https://www.tn.gov/health/cedep/ncov.html

20,625 Confirmed Cases 951 CDC Expanded Case Definition (Probable) 21,576 Total Cases 4,052 Number of Hospitalizations in Ohio 1,114 Confirmed Deaths 111 CDC Expanded Death Definition (Probable) 1,225 Total Deaths 1,151 Number of ICU Admissions <1-106 Age Range 51 Median Age 55%* Sex - Males 44%* Sex - Females https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/home

Researchers hypothesize that a highly contagious strain of the coronavirus is spreading, but other experts remain skeptical People wear face masks and observe social distancing as they wait at an open-air market in Turin, Italy, which reopened Monday after two months of closure because of the coronavirus. (Marco Alpozzi/AP) By Sarah Kaplan and Joel Achenbach May 5, 2020 at 7:46 p.m. EDT A research paper from scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory, not yet peer-reviewed, reports that one strain of the novel coronavirus has emerged in Europe and become dominant around the planet, leading the researchers to believe the virus has mutated to become more contagious. The bold hypothesis, however, was immediately met with skepticism by many infectious-disease experts, and there is no scientific consensus that any of the innumerable mutations in the virus so far have changed the general contagiousness or lethality of covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. The Los Alamos scientists, led by computational biologist Bette Korber and working in conjunction with researchers at Duke University and the University of Sheffield in England, examined a global database of strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease. According to their analysis, one strain featuring a mutation dubbed Spike D614G quickly out-competed other strains after it appeared in Europe. The mutation affects the structure of a protein, called the spike protein, that is critical to the virus’s ability to infect human cells. The researchers believe this structural change enhances infectivity. “The mutation Spike D614G is of urgent concern; it began spreading in Europe in early February, and when introduced to new regions it rapidly becomes the dominant form,” the authors write. They describe the mutation “increasing in frequency at an alarming rate, indicating a fitness advantage relative to the original Wuhan strain that enables more rapid spread.” The paper will now have to survive the intense scrutiny of a research community trying to deliver urgently needed information while remaining scientifically rigorous. Sign up for our Coronavirus Updates newsletter to track the outbreak. All stories linked in the newsletter are free to access. Francis Collins, director the National Institutes of Health, said in a brief email that officials there are aware of the paper, and that it “draws rather sweeping conclusions” about the mutant strain. The novel coronavirus is a master of disguise: Here's how it works The novel coronavirus uses a number of tools to infect our cells and replicate. What we've learned from SARS and MERS can help fight covid-19. (Video: Brian Monroe/Photo: Brian Monroe/The Washington Post) The Los Alamos scientists’ goal was to set up an early-warning system for identifying potentially important mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Like all viruses, this pathogen makes mistakes when it copies its genetic material. But, much the way changing a single letter rarely affects the content of a book, most mutations don’t meaningfully affect the behavior of a virus. The consensus has been that strains of the coronavirus are functionally the same, even if they look genetically different. The fact that the coronavirus is mutating is unsurprising, because all viruses mutate as they replicate. So far, this virus appears relatively stable, according to virologists, but the vast extent of the spread of the coronavirus has given it ample opportunity to evolve. When the Los Alamos research team examined thousands of genome sequences uploaded to the Global Initiative on Sharing of All Influenza Data database, they identified several mutations that distinguished the version of the virus circulating in Europe from the version that originated in Wuhan; the Spike D614G mutation was among them. re were to be something that influenced transmissibility, then the spike protein is the place I expect to find it,” said William Hanage, a Harvard epidemiologist who specializes in the evolution of infectious diseases. But Hanage, like many other outside researchers, was not convinced this mutation actually affects the virus’ ability to infect people. Though the mutated form has become the dominant strain, that could be a consequence of a “founder effect,” Hanage said. When the mutated version arrived in northern Italy, an older and more susceptible population was unable to contain it. “It’s the fox that got into the henhouse,” Hanage said. Hanage pointed to Washington state, where the virus was recognized relatively early and public health measures have proved effective at reducing cases. Both strains were circulating in the state by mid-March — and now, cases of both strains appear to be falling at the same rate. If the European strain really were more transmissible, he would expect it to crowd out all other versions. The national lab did not make Korber, the lead author of the new paper, available for an interview. One prominent scientist, Stanley Perlman, a virologist at the University of Iowa who played a role in naming the coronavirus, said Tuesday that the Los Alamos study looks credible. “It certainly looks like it is more readily transmissible. Viruses mutate to become more transmissible, but not generally to become more virulent (unless this enhances transmissibility),” Perlman said in an email. The research community is far from embracing any of the studies that haven’t gone through the rigorous peer-review process before publication in a journal. Hanage said people should view these pre-print papers skeptically, because the findings have not been reviewed and potentially challenged by other researchers. AD “This is science in an extraordinarily difficult and intense time,” Hanage said. David O’Connor, a virologist at the University of Wisconsin, said the most interesting feature of the Los Alamos research is that the same pattern was seen in multiple locations. But he said “significant caution is warranted” because the data was not collected randomly. The vast majority of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in online databases come from Europe and North America, meaning strains from these regions are overrepresented in research. The Los Alamos scientists did not find evidence that patients with the mutant strain of the virus were more likely to be hospitalized. An increase in contagiousness does not necessarily correlate with greater lethality. The opposite is actually more common as viruses mutate, and some experts speculate that covid-19 could become a milder disease over the course of many years as the virus circulates through the human population. AD Since the early days of the outbreak in China, scientists have known that SARS-CoV-2 is unusually contagious — more so than influenza or a typical cold virus. Scientific estimates of the reproduction number — the R0, which is the number of new infections that each infected person generates on average — have varied among different communities and different points but have generally been between 2 and 4. That is significantly higher than seasonal influenza. One criticism of the Los Alamos hypothesis is that there could be other explanations for why one strain of a virus becomes dominant. University of Wisconsin virologist Thomas Friedrich, who has spent years studying the evolution and transmission of the Zika virus, said a virus that makes its way into a highly susceptible population — for example, Europe in January — will spread like wildfire, quickly becoming the dominant strain in the region. That doesn’t necessarily mean it picked up a mutation that boosts its ability to infect people. It could mean the virus just got lucky — and humans got caught off-guard. When the Zika virus migrated across the Pacific to the Americas and began to cause birth defects, scientists thought it may have picked up some kind of “microcephaly mutation” right when the outbreak in the Americas began, Friedrich said. Experiments showed the virus strain did carry a mutation, and was able to cause nerve tissue damage when it was injected into mouse brains. But when scientists were able to study other variants, they found many of them also had the ability to harm fetuses. What made the virus strain in the Americas so dangerous wasn’t the mutation, but that people on this side of the Pacific had no immunity. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/researchers-hypothesize-that-a-highly-contagious-strain-of-the-coronavirus-is-spreading-but-other-experts-remain-skeptical/2020/05/05/db90d790-8ee7-11ea-9e23-6914ee410a5f_story.html?pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.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.zcupIEgZT-6XK-F1hIjod0F5aCJ2DTdFbd4qOB_jAOs&utm_campaign=wp_to_your_health&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_tyh&wpmk=1

30,399 Cases Reported* Presumed Recovered** 20,316 as of 5/2/2020 Tests Completed 8,660 by State Lab Reported COVID-19 Patients in Hospitals 1,465 187 of those on ventilators Deaths Reported as of 5/5/2020 2,042 73 Probable Deaths*** Commercial Tests 186,012 Performed http://ldh.la.gov/coronavirus/

https://www.mass.gov/doc/covid-19-dashboard-may-6-2020/download

This information is updated daily at 3 p.m., with COVID-19 results included as of 10 a.m. https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98163_98173---,00.html Confirmed COVID-19 Cases by Jurisdiction updated 5/6/2020 County Confirmed Cases Reported Deaths Alcona 4 1 Allegan 124 2 Alpena 86 7 Antrim 10 Arenac 27 1 Baraga 1 Barry 39 1 Bay 176 9 Benzie 4 Berrien 344 20 Branch 72 2 Calhoun 250 17 Cass 35 2 Charlevoix 14 1 Cheboygan 19 1 Chippewa 2 Clare 12 2 Clinton 123 10 Crawford 56 4 Delta 14 2 Detroit City 9536 1126 Dickinson 4 2 Eaton 141 6 Emmet 21 2 Genesee 1710 208 Gladwin 15 1 Gogebic 4 1 Grand Traverse 20 5 Gratiot 26 2 Hillsdale 138 21 Houghton 2 Huron 28 1 Ingham 539 14 Ionia 98 2 Iosco 53 7 Isabella 61 7 Jackson 373 26 Kalamazoo 539 23 Kalkaska 17 2 Kent 2016 40 Lake 2 Lapeer 174 29 Leelanau 9 Lenawee 114 2 Livingston 366 20 Luce 1 Mackinac 6 Macomb 5832 662 Manistee 11 Marquette 51 8 Mason 14 Mecosta 15 2 Menominee 6 Midland 63 7 Missaukee 16 1 Monroe 354 15 Montcalm 46 1 Montmorency 5 Muskegon 335 19 Newaygo 32 Oakland 7573 774 Oceana 22 1 Ogemaw 15 Osceola 8 Oscoda 5 Otsego 95 8 Ottawa 313 14 Presque Isle 11 Roscommon 18 Saginaw 760 74 Sanilac 38 5 Schoolcraft 3 Shiawassee 196 13 St Clair 342 22 St Joseph 44 1 Tuscola 118 16 Van Buren 68 2 Washtenaw 1129 77 Wayne 8035 847 Wexford 9 2 MDOC* 1936 48 FCI** 104 2 Unknown 1 Out of State 6 Totals 45054 4250 *Michigan Department of Corrections **Federal Correctional Institute Note on cumulative counts: This report is provisional and subject to change. As public health investigations of individual cases continue, there will be corrections to the status and details of referred cases that result in changes to this report.City of Detroit and Wayne County are reported separately Note on the deaths: Deaths must be reported by health care providers, medical examiners/coroners, and recorded by local health departments in order to be counted. Note on jurisdictional classification: In order to provide more accurate data, the “Other” jurisdiction category will no longer be used. Michigan Department of Corrections cases will be listed under “MDOC”. Federal Correctional Institution cases will be listed under “FCI”. Note on Case Fatality Rate: The case fatality rate is the number of people who have died from causes associated with COVID-19 out of the total number of people with confirmed COVID-19 infections. It is used as one measure of illness severity. Several factors can affect this number. Until recently, COVID-19 lab testing has prioritized for hospitalized individuals due to limited testing availability. As a result, COVID-19 infections were identified more often in people who were more severely ill. This would lead to a higher case fatality rate. As more people with mild illness are tested, it is likely the case fatality rate will go down. Links DAILY COUNTS LAB TESTING DATA ABOUT PLACES LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES CORONAVIRUS SYMPTOMS Cumulative Total of Recovered COVID-19 Cases (as of 5/1/2020): 15,659 Note on recovery: During this response, MDHHS is reviewing vital records statistics to identify any laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases who are 30 days out from their onset of illness to represent recovery status. As the pandemic continues to impact Michigan, this pool will expand to include more cases. Recovered is defined as the number of persons with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who are alive 30 days post-onset (or referral date if onset is not available). The number of persons recovered on May 1, 2020 represents COVID-19 confirmed individuals with an onset date on or prior to April 1, 2020. If an individual dies from a COVID-related cause >30 days from onset/referral, they are removed from the number of persons recovered. These numbers will be updated every Saturday. Source: Michigan Disease Surveillance System and Vital Records Age Data of Overall Deceased Average Age 74.9 years Median Age 76 years Age Range 5-107 years Overall Case Fatality Rate Statewide Confirmed Cases 9% Cases by Sex Sex Percentage of Overall Cases by Sex Percentage of Deceased Cases by Sex Male 46% 53% Female 53% 46% Unknown 1% <1% Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding Cases by Age Age Percentage of Overall Cases by Age Percentage of Deceased Cases by Age 0 to 19 2% <1% 20 to 29 10% <1% 30 to 39 13% 1% 40 to 49 16% 3% 50 to 59 19% 8% 60 to 69 17% 19% 70 to 79 12% 28% 80+ 11% 41% Unknown <1% 0% Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding Cases by Race Race Percentage of Overall Cases by Race Percentage of Deceased Cases by Race American Indian or Alaska Native <1% <1% Asian/Pacific Islander 2% 1% Black or African American 32% 41% Caucasian 34% 49% Multiple Races 7% 2% Other 5% 2% Unknown 20% 5% Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding Cases by Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity Percentage of Overall Cases by Ethnicity Percentage of Deceased Cases by Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 5% 2% Non-Hispanic Latino 61% 79% Unknown 34% 19% Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding Cases by Arab Ethnicity Arab Ethnicity Percentage of Overall Cases by Ethnicity Percentage of Deceased Cases by Ethnicity Arab 2% 1% Non-Arab 31% 33% Unknown 67% 66% Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding MICHIGAN.GOV HOME ADA MICHIGAN NEWS POLICIES Have questions? Chat with Robin

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Illinois Test Results Positive 68,232 Deaths 2,974 Total Tests Performed* 361,260 *Total tests performed and reported electronically for testing of COVID-19 at IDPH, commercial or hospital laboratories. Deaths are included in the number of positive cases All numbers displayed are provisional and subject to change. Information last updated on 5/6/2020. Information to be updated daily.

Harris County 7,128 Dallas County 4,623 Tarrant County 2,686 Travis County 1,876 Bexar County 1,677 Fort Bend County 1,245 El Paso County 1,080 Potter County 907 Denton County 832 Collin County 828 Montgomery County 662 Galveston County 659 Brazoria County 570 Lubbock County 567 Cameron County 454 Moore County 448 Webb County 400 Taylor County 378 Hidalgo County 353 Jefferson County 335 Williamson County 333 Randall County 310 Walker County 303 Brazos County 219 Bell County 210 Coryell County 190 Nacogdoches County 189 Ellis County 184 Hays County 176 Harrison County 160 Smith County 156 Washington County 150 Victoria County 146 Panola County 136 Shelby County 131 Nueces County 114 Hardin County 112 Gregg County 107 Kaufman County 101 Bastrop County 100 Johnson County 95 Rockwall County 95 McLennan County 92 Midland County 91 Guadalupe County 88 Angelina County 86 Ector County 85 Jones County 84 Orange County 79 Bowie County 76 Gray County 71 Lamar County 71 Wichita County 70 Matagorda County 62 Comal County 59 Grayson County 58 Tom Green County 56 Hunt County 54 Liberty County 47 Chambers County 45 Deaf Smith County 41 Parker County 41 Wharton County 40 Rusk County 39 Anderson County 38 Brown County 38 Waller County 36 Calhoun County 34 Wilson County 34 Henderson County 33 Navarro County 33 Gonzales County 31 Hale County 31 Dawson County 30 Polk County 30 Wise County 28 Mason County 27 Maverick County 26 Ochiltree County 26 Donley County 25 Grimes County 25 Burnet County 24 Caldwell County 24 Titus County 23 Fannin County 22 Andrews County 21 Atascosa County 21 San Augustine County 21 Castro County 20 Cherokee County 20 Hockley County 20 Hutchinson County 20 Medina County 20 Hood County 19 Hill County 18 Jasper County 18 Milam County 18 Sherman County 18 Van Zandt County 18 Cass County 17 Fayette County 17 Kendall County 17 Upshur County 16 De Witt County 15 Marion County 15 Austin County 14 Burleson County 14 Jackson County 14 Parmer County 14 Pecos County 14 San Patricio County 14 Erath County 13 Limestone County 13 Val Verde County 13 Willacy County 13 Colorado County 12 Terry County 12 Wheeler County 12 Cooke County 11 Hansford County 11 Swisher County 11 Wood County 11 Dallam County 10 Frio County 10 Kleberg County 10 San Jacinto County 10 Starr County 10 Trinity County 10 Houston County 9 Montague County 9 Morris County 9 Palo Pinto County 9 Camp County 7 Freestone County 7 Goliad County 7 Hartley County 7 Leon County 7 Tyler County 7 Zapata County 7 Bandera County 6 Bee County 6 Blanco County 6 Falls County 6 Hopkins County 6 Howard County 6 Kerr County 6 Lavaca County 6 Uvalde County 6 Bosque County 5 Hamilton County 5 Jim Wells County 5 Lampasas County 5 Live Oak County 5 Lynn County 5 Floyd County 4 Gillespie County 4 Jack County 4 Lamb County 4 Newton County 4 Robertson County 4 Young County 4 Carson County 3 Clay County 3 Comanche County 3 Cottle County 3 Duval County 3 Eastland County 3 Franklin County 3 Gaines County 3 Garza County 3 Jim Hogg County 3 Karnes County 3 Llano County 3 McCulloch County 3 Martin County 3 Oldham County 3 Winkler County 3 Aransas County 2 Armstrong County 2 Bailey County 2 Callahan County 2 Crane County 2 Crosby County 2 Lee County 2 Lipscomb County 2 Nolan County 2 Rains County 2 Roberts County 2 Runnels County 2 Scurry County 2 Wilbarger County 2 Yoakum County 2 Brewster County 1 Briscoe County 1 Brooks County 1 Childress County 1 Cochran County 1 Coke County 1 Coleman County 1 Collingsworth County 1 Concho County 1 Delta County 1 Dickens County 1 Dimmit County 1 Glasscock County 1 Hemphill County 1 Knox County 1 La Salle County 1 Madison County 1 Mitchell County 1 Motley County 1 Red River County 1 Refugio County 1 Sabine County 1 Stephens County 1 Zavala County 1 https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83

Bergen County: 16,520 Positive Test Results 1,289 Deaths Hudson County: 16,197 Positive Test Results 903 Deaths Essex County: 14,951 Positive Test Results 1,349 Deaths Passaic County: 13,971 Positive Test Results 690 Deaths Union County: 13,604 Positive Test Results 800 Deaths Middlesex County: 13,254 Positive Test Results 706 Deaths Ocean County: 7,125 Positive Test Results 483 Deaths Monmouth County: 6,552 Positive Test Results 417 Deaths Morris County: 5,655 Positive Test Results 491 Deaths Mercer County: 4,860 Positive Test Results 298 Deaths Camden County: 4,307 Positive Test Results 189 Deaths Somerset County: 3,860 Positive Test Results 315 Deaths Burlington County: 3,235 Positive Test Results 177 Deaths Gloucester County: 1,499 Positive Test Results 63 Deaths Atlantic County: 1,246 Positive Test Results 54 Deaths Cumberland County: 1,059 Positive Test Results 25 Deaths Sussex County: 995 Positive Test Results 122 Deaths Warren County: 993 Positive Test Results 94 Deaths Hunterdon County: 682 Positive Test Results 39 Deaths Cape May County: 378 Positive Test Results 28 Deaths Salem County: 353 Positive Test Results 17 Deaths https://www.nj.gov/health/cd/topics/covid2019_dashboard.shtml

https://coronavirus.iowa.gov/

New Positive Cases 862 between 04/25/2020 and 05/05/2020 New Deaths 51 between 04/20/2020 and 05/05/2020 New Tests 4,692 between 03/30/2020 and 05/05/2020 Total Positive Cases 21,870 Total Deaths 1,264 Total Tested 120,49618.1% Positive https://www.coronavirus.in.gov/

May 5, 2020 Total Tested Overall: 24,984 Total Positives: 5,461 Total Lives Lost: 277* Total Recovered: 808 Download copy of DC COVID-19 data *The District has determined that a previously reported death was not due to COVID-19 and has been removed from the reported total of lives lost. Other Data Public Safety Agency Data Human Services Agency Data Hospital Status Data https://coronavirus.dc.gov/page/coronavirus-data

Aitkin County: 1 Anoka County: 382 Becker County: 16 Beltrami County: 6 Benton County: 59 Big Stone County: 2 Blue Earth County: 53 Brown County: 9 Carlton County: 61 Carver County: 51 Cass County: 7 Chippewa County: 4 Chisago County: 14 Clay County: 215 Clearwater County: 2 Cottonwood County: 42 Crow Wing County: 21 Dakota County: 292 Dodge County: 21 Douglas County: 12 Faribault County: 8 Fillmore County: 12 Freeborn County: 38 Goodhue County: 23 Grant County: 1 Hennepin County: 2,764 Houston County: 1 Isanti County: 7 Itasca County: 24 Jackson County: 25 Kanabec County: 2 Kandiyohi County: 211 Kittson County: 1 Koochiching County: 1 Lac Qui Parle County: 2 Le Sueur County: 26 Lincoln County: 3 Lyon County: 11 Mahnomen County: 2 Marshall County: 7 Martin County: 111 McLeod County: 6 Meeker County: 18 Mille Lacs County: 5 Morrison County: 9 Mower County: 35 Murray County: 20 Nicollet County: 17 Nobles County: 1,082 Norman County: 9 Olmsted County: 322 Otter Tail County: 19 Pennington County: 1 Pine County: 61 Pipestone County: 4 Polk County: 43 Pope County: 1 Ramsey County: 656 Red Lake County: 1 Redwood County: 3 Renville County: 6 Rice County: 30 Rock County: 18 Roseau County: 1 Scott County: 90 Sherburne County: 80 Sibley County: 2 St. Louis County: 86 Stearns County: 975 Steele County: 29 Swift County: 2 Todd County: 18 Traverse County: 2 Wabasha County: 10 Wadena County: 3 Waseca County: 7 Washington County: 181 Watonwan County: 15 Wilkin County: 11 Winona County: 68 Wright County: 69 Yellow Medicine County: 3 https://mndps.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/f28f84968c1148129932c3bebb1d3a1a

Positive Cases 5,778 New Castle County: 2,087 positive cases Kent County: 891 positive cases Unknown County: 36 positive cases Sussex County: 2,764 positive cases https://coronavirus.delaware.gov/

Virus name: hCoV-19/USA/WI-GMF-00281/2020 Accession ID: EPI_ISL_419652 Type: betacoronavirus Passage details/history: Original Sample information Collection date: 2020-03-25 Location: North America / USA / Wisconsin / La Crosse County Host: Human

Virus name: hCoV-19/USA/WI-GMF-00384/2020 Accession ID: EPI_ISL_422464 Type: betacoronavirus Passage details/history: Original Sample information Collection date: 2020-03-26 Location: North America / USA / Wisconsin Host: Human Additional location information: La Crosse County

Virus name: hCoV-19/USA/WI-GMF-00822/2020 Accession ID: EPI_ISL_429843 Type: betacoronavirus Passage details/history: Original Sample information Collection date: 2020-04-08 Location: North America / USA / Wisconsin / La Crosse County Host: Human

Virus name: hCoV-19/USA/WI-GMF-01602/2020 Accession ID: EPI_ISL_435400 Type: betacoronavirus Passage details/history: Original Sample information Collection date: 2020-04-23 Location: North America / USA / Wisconsin / La Crosse County Host: Human