niman

CASES 369,458 TOTAL 297,753 CONFIRMED 71,705 PROBABLE LAST 14 DAYS 50,552 CASES 117,408 TESTED (DIAGNOSTIC) *TOTAL HOSPITALIZATIONS To Date Updates M-F at 3 p.m. 34,373 STATEWIDE DEATHS 4,872 TOTAL 4,254 CONFIRMED 618 PROBABLE TOTAL TESTED 1,891,468 DIAGNOSTIC 88,383 ANTIBODY PRESUMED RECOVERIES Updated Weekly 202,137 STATEWIDE

https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/coronavirus/covid-19-in-virginia/

https://coronavirus.iowa.gov/#CurrentStatus

SARS-CoV-2 Variants Disease Outbreak News 31 December 2020 SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has had a major impact on human health globally; infecting a large number of people; causing severe disease and associated long-term health sequelae; resulting in death and excess mortality, especially among older and vulnerable populations; interrupting routine healthcare services; disruptions to travel, trade, education and many other societal functions; and more broadly having a negative impact on peoples physical and mental health. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO has received several reports of unusual public health events possibly due to variants of SARS-CoV-2. WHO routinely assesses if variants of SARS-CoV-2 result in changes in transmissibility, clinical presentation and severity, or if they impact on countermeasures, including diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Previous reports of the D614G mutation and the recent reports of virus variants from the Kingdom of Denmark, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Republic of South Africa have raised interest and concern in the impact of viral changes. A variant of SARS-CoV-2 with a D614G substitution in the gene encoding the spike protein emerged in late January or early February 2020. Over a period of several months, the D614G mutation replaced the initial SARS-CoV-2 strain identified in China and by June 2020 became the dominant form of the virus circulating globally. Studies in human respiratory cells and in animal models demonstrated that compared to the initial virus strain, the strain with the D614G substitution has increased infectivity and transmission. The SARS-CoV-2 virus with the D614G substitution does not cause more severe illness or alter the effectiveness of existing laboratory diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, or public health preventive measures. In August and September 2020, a SARS-CoV-2 variant linked to infection among farmed mink and subsequently transmitted to humans, was identified in North Jutland, Denmark. The variant, referred to as the “Cluster 5” variant by Danish authorities, has a combination of mutations not previously observed. Due preliminary studies conducted in Denmark, there is concern that this variant has may result in reduced virus neutralization in humans, which could potentially decrease the extend and duration of immune protection following natural infection or vaccination. Studies are ongoing to assess virus neutralization among humans with this variant. To date, following extensive investigation and surveillance, Danish authorities have identified only 12 human cases of the Cluster 5 variant in September 2020, and it does not appear to have spread widely. On 14 December 2020, authorities of the United Kingdom reported to WHO a variant referred to by the United Kingdom as SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 (Variant of Concern, year 2020, month 12, variant 01). This variant contains 23 nucleotide substitutions and is not phylogenetically related to the SARS-CoV-2 virus circulating in the United Kingdom at the time the variant was detected. How and where SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 originated is unclear. SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 initially appeared in South East England but within a few weeks began to replace other virus lineages in this geographic area and London. As of 26 December 2020, SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 has been identified from routine sampling and genomic testing conducted across the United Kingdom . Preliminary epidemiologic, modelling, phylogenetic and clinical findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 has increased transmissibility. However, preliminary analyses also indicate that there is no change in disease severity (as measured by length of hospitalization and 28-day case fatality), or occurrence of reinfection between variant cases compared to other SARS-CoV-2 viruses circulating in the United Kingdom.1 Another of the mutations in the VOC 202012/01 variant, the deletion at position 69/70del was found to affect the performance of some diagnostic PCR assays with an S gene target. Most PCR assays in use worldwide will use multiple targets and therefore the impact of the variant on diagnostics is not anticipated to be significant. Laboratory evaluation has demonstrated no significant impact on the performance of antigen-based lateral flow devices. As of 30 December, VOC-202012/01 variant has been reported in 31 other countries/territories/areas in five of the six WHO regions. On 18 December, national authorities in South Africa announced the detection of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 that is rapidly spreading in three provinces of South Africa. South Africa has named this variant 501Y.V2, because of a N501Y mutation. While SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 from the UK also has the N501Y mutation, phylogenetic analysis has shown that 501Y.V2 from South Africa are different virus variants. In the week beginning 16 November, routine sequencing by South African health authorities found that this new SARS-CoV-2 variant has largely replaced other SARS-CoV-2 viruses circulating in the Eastern Cape, Western Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal provinces. While genomic data highlighted that the 501.V2 variant rapidly displaced other lineages circulating in South Africa, and preliminary studies suggest the variant is associated with a higher viral load, which may suggest potential for increased transmissibility, this, as well as other factors that influence transmissibility, are subject of further investigation. Moreover, at this stage, there is no clear evidence of the new variant being associated with more severe disease or worse outcomes. Further investigations are needed to understand the impact on transmission, clinical severity of infection, laboratory diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, or public health preventive measures. As of 30 December, the 501Y.V2 variant from South Africa has been reported from four other countries to date. Public health response The authorities in the affected countries are conducting epidemiological and virological investigations to further assess the transmissibility, severity, risk of reinfection and antibody response to new variants. As one of the mutations (N501Y) – found in both the SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 and 501Y.V2 variants – is in the receptor binding domain, the authorities are investigating the neutralization activity of sera from recovered and vaccinated patients against these variants to determine if there is any impact on vaccine performance. These studies are ongoing. Genomic data of the SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 and 501Y.V2 variants has been shared by the national authorities and uploaded to the Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) and genomic surveillance of the virus continues, globally. The following activities have been initiated: National authorities that have reported virus variants are undertaking intensified sampling to understand how widely these new variants are circulating. National scientific teams are studying the effect of the mutations on reinfection potential, vaccination, diagnostic testing, infection-severity and transmissibility. Researchers and government authorities are working with WHO and collaborating with members of the WHO SARS-CoV-2 virus evolution working group to assess epidemiologic, modelling, phylogenetic and laboratory findings as results become available. WHO is working with countries to identify how current surveillance systems can be strengthened or adapted to evaluate potential virus variations through ongoing systematic clinical and epidemiologic surveillance, establishment of genetic sequencing capacity where possible, and providing access to international sequencing services to send samples for sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Risk communication and community engagement activities scaled up to explain the public health implications of SARS-CoV-2 variants to the public and emphasize the importance of maintaining ongoing preventive measures to reduce transmission such as wearing face coverings, practicing hand hygiene and cough etiquette, keeping physical distance, ensuring good ventilation and avoiding crowded places. As part of WHO’s SARS-CoV-2 global laboratory network, which has monitored virus mutations from the start of the pandemic, a specific working group on virus evolution was established in June 2020, composed of experts in sequencing, bioinformatics, and in vivo and in vitro laboratory studies. The Virus Evolution Working Group works to 1) strengthen mechanisms to identify and prioritize (potentially) relevant mutations; 2) identify relevant mutations early and study the potential impacts related to viral characteristics (e.g. virulence, transmission) and effectiveness of available and future countermeasures (e.g. diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics); 3) evaluate possible mitigation strategies to reduce the negative impact of mutations; and 4) study the impact of specific mutations, including laboratory-controlled in vitro and in vivo studies of variants. Sharing of full genome sequences is facilitating detailed analyses by partners. The Working Group is collaborating with international scientists with a broad scope of expertise in virology in general and coronaviruses specifically to better understand the research findings and support further studies. WHO risk assessment All viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, change over time, most without a direct benefit to the virus in terms of increasing its infectiousness or transmissibility, and sometimes limiting propagation (see Q&A on COVID-19 and related health topics ). The potential for virus mutation increases with the frequency of human and animal infections. Therefore, reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by using established disease control methods as well as avoiding introductions to animal populations, are critical aspects to the global strategy to reduce the occurrence of mutations that have negative public health implications. Preliminary data suggest that the growth rate and effective reproductive number is elevated in areas of the United Kingdom with community circulation of the novel variant VOC-202012/01. In South Africa, genomic data highlighted that the 501Y.V2 variant rapidly displaced other lineages circulating, and preliminary studies suggest the variant is associated with a higher viral load, which may suggest potential for increased transmissibility; however, this, as well as other factors that influence transmissibility, are subject of further investigation. Epidemiologic investigations are underway to understand the increase in cases in these communities and the potential role of increased transmissibility of these variants as well as the robustness of implementation of control measures. While initial assessment suggests that 202012/01 and 501Y.V2 do not cause changes in clinical presentation or severity, if they result in a higher case incidence, this would lead to an increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. More intensive public health measures may be required to control transmission of these variants. Further investigations are required to understand the impact of specific mutations on viral properties and the effectiveness of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. These investigations are complex and require time and collaboration among different research groups. These studies are ongoing. WHO advice National and local authorities should continue to strengthen existing disease control activities, including monitoring their epidemics closely through ongoing epidemiological surveillance and strategic testing; conducting outbreak investigation and contact tracing; and where appropriate, adjusting public health and social measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. WHO further advises countries, where feasible, to increase routine systematic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 viruses to better understand SARS-CoV-2 transmission and to monitor for the emergence of variants. Sequence data should be shared internationally through publicly accessible databases. In countries with sequencing capacity, WHO advises sequencing of isolates from a systematically selected subset of SARS-CoV-2 infections – the amount will depend on local capacities. Genetic sequencing should also be considered as part of investigations of unusual transmission events (e.g. increased transmission in spite of existing control measures) or unexpected disease presentation/severity. Where limited sequencing capacity exists, countries are encouraged to increase capacity in collaboration with public, academic and private sequencing laboratories, and may arrange sequencing at collaborating laboratories in the COVID-19 reference laboratory network. While mutations of SARS-CoV-2 are expected, it is important to continue to monitor the public health implications of new virus variants. Any increased in transmissibility associated with SARS-CoV-2 variants could make control more difficult. Current disease control measures recommended by WHO continue to be effective and should be adapted in response to increasing disease incidence, whether associated with a new variant or not. Prevention advice and communications for the public should be further strengthened, including precautions to protect yourself and others such as physical distancing, wearing a mask, keeping rooms well ventilated, avoiding crowds, cleaning hands, and coughing into a bent elbow or tissue. Moreover, infection prevention and control guidance and measures should reinforced, including: Use appropriate personal protective equipment when caring for people suffering from an acute respiratory illness; Practice frequent hand-washing, especially after direct contact with ill people or their environment Practice cough etiquette (maintain distance, cover coughs and sneezes with disposable tissues or clothing, and wash hands) Enhance standard infection prevention and control practices in hospitals, especially in emergency departments Wear masks where appropriate, ensure good ventilation where possible and avoid crowded places WHO has recently published an interim guidance – "Considerations for implementing a risk-based approach to international travel in the context of COVID-19", recommending the following principles for international travelers in the context of COVID-19 Pandemic: Confirmed, probable and suspected cases, and contacts of confirmed or probable cases should not travel Persons with any sign or symptom compatible with COVID-19 should not travel, unless COVID-19 diagnostic testing has been conducted and SARS-CoV-2 infection has been ruled out as the cause for illness Persons who are unwell should be advised to postpone travel Persons at risk of developing severe disease from COVID-19, including people 60 years of age or older or those with comorbidities that present increased risk of severe COVID-19 (e.g. heart disease, cancer and diabetes) should be advised to postpone travel Depending on local restrictions, persons residing in areas where community-wide movement restrictions are in place should not be allowed to travel for non-essential purposes In case of symptoms suggestive of acute respiratory illness either during or after travel, travelers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share their travel history with their health care provider Health authorities should work with travel, transport and tourism sectors to provide travelers, including to and from the countries affected by the new variants, with aforementioned information, via travel health clinics, travel agencies, conveyance operators and at points of entry, as well as communities adjacent to land borders with affected countries. The interim guidance also provides countries with a risk-based approach to decision-making, calibrating travel-related risk mitigation measures in the context of international travel, aiming at reducing travel-associated exportation, importation and onward transmission of SARS-CoV-2 while avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic. Some countries have recently introduced travel restrictions as a precautionary measure in response to the appearance of new variants. WHO recommends that all countries take a risk-based approach for adjusting measures in the context of international travel, which includes assessing local transmission, health services capacity, what is known about the level of transmissibility of specific variants; social and economic impact of restrictions; and adherence to public health and social measures. National authorities are encouraged to publish their risk assessment methodology and the list of departure countries or areas to which restrictions apply; and these should be updated regularly. In line with the advice provided by the Emergency Committee on COVID-19 at its most recent meeting, WHO recommends that States Parties should regularly re-consider measures applied to international travel in compliance with Article 43 of the International Health Regulations (2005) and continue to provide information and rationale to WHO on measures that significantly interfere with international traffic. Countries should also ensure that measures affecting international traffic are risk-based, evidence-based, coherent, proportionate and time limited. In all circumstances, essential travel (e.g., emergency responders; providers of public health technical support; critical personnel in transport and security sector such as seafarers; repatriations; and cargo transport for essential supplies such as food, medicines and fuel) identified by countries should always be prioritized and facilitated. For more information on COVID-19, please see: WHO COVID-19 information WHO Technical interim guidance for COVID-19 WHO COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update and Weekly Operational Update WHO Considerations for implementing a risk-based approach to international travel in the context of COVID-19 WHO Dashboard for COVID-19 WHO Public Health and Social Measures Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) 1 Public Health England. Investigation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variant, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Technical briefing 2- 28 December 2020. PHE: London;2020

SARS-CoV-2 Variants Disease Outbreak News 31 December 2020 SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has had a major impact on human health globally; infecting a large number of people; causing severe disease and associated long-term health sequelae; resulting in death and excess mortality, especially among older and vulnerable populations; interrupting routine healthcare services; disruptions to travel, trade, education and many other societal functions; and more broadly having a negative impact on peoples physical and mental health. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO has received several reports of unusual public health events possibly due to variants of SARS-CoV-2. WHO routinely assesses if variants of SARS-CoV-2 result in changes in transmissibility, clinical presentation and severity, or if they impact on countermeasures, including diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Previous reports of the D614G mutation and the recent reports of virus variants from the Kingdom of Denmark, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Republic of South Africa have raised interest and concern in the impact of viral changes. https://www.who.int/csr/don/31-december-2020-sars-cov2-variants/en/

By Los Angeles Times Staff Updated Jan. 1 9:59 p.m. Pacific 2,325,907 confirmed cases +29,874 on Friday 26,362 deaths +378 on Friday 335,983 vaccinated 1.1% of adults To better understand the COVID-19 pandemic, The Times is conducting an independent, continual survey of dozens of local health agencies across the state. What we know The holiday drove down new case counts. Many local health departments closed for Christmas. Tallies over the holiday weekend are not fully representative. Stay-at-home orders have returned. Most of the state, including Los Angeles County, is currently under stricter rules. New cases have been surging. Over the last seven days, the state has averaged 39,650 cases per day, a significant jump from before the holidays. Roughly 12.6% of tests this past week have come back positive. Deaths are on the rise. The state has averaged 339 daily deaths over the last week, an increase of 49.7% from two weeks ago. Hospitalizations have never been higher. Statewide, there are 20,540 people hospitalized with a confirmed case, 28% more than two weeks ago. Among those patients, 4,525 are in intensive care. Disparities in age and race persist. Roughly 74% of the dead were 65 or older. After adjusting for population, Latinos are now 2.6 times more likely than whites to test positive. California counties +Other trackers +More coverage + Jump to a section Totals Hotspots Maps Hospitals Vaccine Tests Demographics Nursing homes Prisons State rankings The latest totals Coronavirus can infect people so rapidly that it has continued to spread despite shutdown orders aimed at slowing the growth of new cases and flattening the line below. The number of cases in California is now on pace to double every 39.9 days, a number used to measure how quickly the virus is spreading. CasesDeaths Cumulative cases Feb.AprilJuneAug.Oct.Dec.0500,0001,000,0001,500,0002,000,000Stay-at-home orderStay-at-home orderGovernoreases limitsGovernoreases limits2,325,907Jan. 1 Times survey of county and local health departments Local governments announce new cases and deaths each day, though bottlenecks in bureaucracy can introduce delays. For instance, some agencies do not report new totals on holidays and weekends, leading to lower numbers on those days. Over the past week, the state has averaged 39,650 new cases and 339 new deaths per day. Experts say the true number of people infected is unknown and likely much higher than official tallies. New cases by day Feb.AprilJuneAug.Oct.Dec.010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,0007-dayaverage7-dayaverage Deaths by day Feb.AprilJuneAug.Oct.Dec.02004006007-dayaverage7-dayaverage Seven-day averages offer a more stable view of the trend than daily totals. On the cases chart, gray bars mark when errors in a state computer system delayed the tabulation of new cases. Where new cases are concentrated State officials study the latest data and then rate regions and counties to determine when and how businesses reopen. The government doesn‘t release enough data to replicate its analysis, but the rate of new cases per 100,000 residents over the last seven days provides insight into where the virus is spreading. Metric CasesDeaths Method Per 100kTotals Regions ranked by new cases per 100,000 residents 1. Southern California 892.7 cases per 100k in last 7 days892.7 cases per 100k in last 7 days7-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 2. San Joaquin Valley 622.6622.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 3. Bay Area 398.5398.57-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 4. Greater Sacramento 369.4369.47-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 5. Northern California 341.2341.27-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 After adjusting for population, the virus is now categorized as widespread in 54 the state's 58 counties, which results in stricter rules being put into place. Together they are home to 99% of California residents. Metric CasesDeaths Method Per 100kTotals Counties ranked by new cases per 100,000 residents 1. Lassen 1,638.6 cases per 100k in last 7 days1,638.6 cases per 100k in last 7 days7-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 2. Los Angeles 1,114.51,114.57-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 3. San Bernardino 9509507-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 4. Riverside 941.7941.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 5. Amador 906.7906.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 6. Monterey 813.9813.97-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 7. Madera 765.1765.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 8. San Benito 759.1759.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 9. Kern 729.3729.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 10. Ventura 726.1726.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 11. Tulare 656.1656.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 12. Colusa 638.3638.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 13. Merced 616.6616.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 14. San Joaquin 611.7611.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 15. San Diego 608.9608.97-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 16. Fresno 608.7608.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 17. Kings 601.7601.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 18. Orange 596.5596.57-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 19. Santa Clara 554.8554.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 20. Imperial 542.7542.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 21. Tehama 5165167-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 22. Santa Cruz 510.3510.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 23. Sutter 488.2488.27-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 24. Tuolumne 478.4478.47-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 25. Stanislaus 4734737-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 26. Napa 462.5462.57-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 27. Sierra 443.7443.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 28. Solano 428.9428.97-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 29. Glenn 405.1405.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 30. Placer 392.8392.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 31. Santa Barbara 390.8390.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 32. Mono 3813817-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 33. Modoc 369.2369.27-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 34. Sacramento 362.6362.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 35. Yuba 357.6357.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 36. Butte 354.9354.97-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 37. Contra Costa 3523527-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 38. Alameda 347.3347.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 39. Yolo 342.8342.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 40. El Dorado 334.3334.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 41. Inyo 331.8331.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 42. San Luis Obispo 3293297-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 43. San Mateo 306.6306.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 44. Lake 3043047-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 45. Mendocino 279.1279.17-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 46. Shasta 275.3275.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 47. Del Norte 269.8269.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 48. Alpine 261.3261.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 49. Mariposa 245.2245.27-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 50. Plumas 2302307-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 51. Sonoma 229.8229.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 52. Siskiyou 229.7229.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 53. Calaveras 218.9218.97-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 54. San Francisco 208.3208.37-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 55. Nevada 195.8195.87-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 56. Humboldt 165.7165.77-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 57. Marin 107.6107.67-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 58. Trinity 85.585.57-day average │7-day average │March 1Jan. 2 Show less The Times' calculation of per capita rates can vary from what's published elsewhere. To learn more about how and why this count sometimes differs from official figures, consult our FAQ. What's open where? See how the governor has rated all 58 counties, and what that means for reopening, in our county reopening tracker. Mapping the toll The coronavirus has been found in all 58 counties, from urban Southern California to the state's rural north. Cumulative totals Metric CasesDeaths Method Per 100kTotals Confirmed cases1.3k2.9k4.3k5.8k7.2k10.9k15k Hover for more information. Los AngelesLos AngelesSan DiegoSan DiegoSacramentoSacramentoSan FranciscoSan FranciscoReddingReddingFresnoFresno Cumulative totals County Cases Per 100k Friday Deaths Per 100k Friday Lassen » 4,691 15,042.5 – 10 32.1 – Imperial » 22,219 12,329.1 – 420 233.1 – Kings » 16,394 10,923.9 +280 110 73.3 – San Bernardino » 194,377 9,102.5 – 1,445 67.7 – Kern » 69,484 7,868.6 +515 512 58 – Los Angeles » 790,582 7,829.1 +19,063 10,552 104.5 +193 Riverside » 180,553 7,575.8 – 1,985 83.3 – Tulare » 33,443 7,262.7 – 406 88.2 – Merced » 19,444 7,226.2 – 260 96.6 – Fresno » 66,442 6,792.8 +1,042 711 72.7 +65 Sutter » 6,505 6,785.1 – 52 54.2 – Amador » 2,562 6,772.6 +47 24 63.4 – Madera » 10,491 6,767.8 – 117 75.5 – Monterey » 28,064 6,478.1 +205 196 45.2 +3 Mono » 911 6,427.3 +14 4 28.2 – Stanislaus » 34,465 6,390.7 – 616 114.2 – Colusa » 1,351 6,294.3 – 8 37.3 – San Benito » 3,739 6,292.9 +66 29 48.8 – San Joaquin » 45,583 6,225.4 – 651 88.9 – Alpine » 67 5,836.2 – 0 0 – Tuolumne » 2,962 5,492.1 – 21 38.9 – Tehama » 3,344 5,276.7 +52 37 58.4 +1 Glenn » 1,449 5,194.1 – 14 50.2 – Yuba » 3,898 5,163.4 – 19 25.2 – Orange » 157,183 4,967.6 – 1,875 59.3 – San Diego » 160,073 4,846.5 +4,478 1,592 48.2 +58 Ventura » 39,559 4,664.4 – 263 31 – Shasta » 8,060 4,500.7 – 78 43.6 – Solano » 19,211 4,380.8 – 98 22.3 – Sacramento » 65,245 4,320.8 – 857 56.8 – Napa » 5,741 4,085.2 – 28 19.9 – Santa Barbara » 17,391 3,919.2 – 160 36.1 – Yolo » 8,238 3,832 – 111 51.6 – Sonoma » 19,055 3,801 +63 192 38.3 +2 Marin » 9,729 3,737.7 – 139 53.4 – Santa Clara » 71,755 3,733 +1,876 747 38.9 +38 San Luis Obispo » 10,397 3,694 – 82 29.1 – Contra Costa » 41,599 3,670.8 +902 347 30.6 +12 Modoc » 326 3,647.3 +3 1 11.2 – Placer » 13,755 3,619 – 125 32.9 – Inyo » 635 3,511.2 – 20 110.6 – Butte » 7,390 3,254.4 – 96 42.3 – San Mateo » 24,589 3,210.3 – 227 29.6 – Santa Cruz » 8,749 3,195.8 – 83 30.3 – Alameda » 52,291 3,181.3 +701 659 40.1 +2 El Dorado » 5,719 3,063.8 – 24 12.9 – Lake » 1,883 2,935.4 +37 24 37.4 – Mendocino » 2,558 2,926 +71 27 30.9 +1 Del Norte » 769 2,804.1 +9 2 7.3 – San Francisco » 23,521 2,703.4 +447 189 21.7 +3 Siskiyou » 1,176 2,701 – 11 25.3 – Nevada » 2,609 2,632.9 – 50 50.5 – Plumas » 486 2,599.1 – 4 21.4 – Trinity » 276 2,145.9 – 4 31.1 – Calaveras » 853 1,885.7 – 22 48.6 – Sierra » 47 1,604.1 – 0 0 – Mariposa » 255 1,453.8 +3 4 22.8 – Humboldt » 1,764 1,299.3 – 22 16.2 – Show less Residents of cities, neighborhoods and regions all across the state have contracted the coronavirus. Here are the latest tallies for 1,350 places as released by county health departments. Confirmed cases 100 1,000 10,000 Counties that do not report cases by locality © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap Improve this map The following counties currently do not report cases by locality: Alpine, Colusa, Glenn, Mariposa, Modoc, San Benito, Tehama and Tuolumne Filter by countyAlameda Amador Butte Calaveras Contra Costa Del Norte El Dorado Fresno Humboldt Imperial Inyo Kern Kings Lake Lassen Los Angeles Madera Marin Mendocino Merced Mono Monterey Napa Nevada Orange Placer Plumas Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Santa Cruz Shasta Sierra Siskiyou Solano Sonoma Stanislaus Sutter Trinity Tulare Ventura Yolo Yuba Search by name Area Confirmed cases East Los Angeles 17,374 Pomona 16,770 Palmdale 15,579 Lancaster 13,971 North Hollywood 12,928 South Gate 12,287 Santa Clarita 12,130 Boyle Heights 11,856 Downey 11,800 El Monte 11,507 Glendale 11,483 Pacoima 11,330 Compton 10,959 Sylmar 10,232 Norwalk 10,183 Van Nuys 9,619 Unincorporated - Florence-Firestone 9,193 Lynwood 8,901 Panorama City 8,710 Baldwin Park 8,605 West Covina 8,423 Inglewood 8,328 90805: Long Beach 8,102 Huntington Park 7,589 Pico Rivera 7,515 Vernon Central 7,502 Whittier 7,342 Reseda 7,289 Bellflower 6,934 Montebello 6,921 Pasadena 6,879 Paramount 6,658 West Vernon 6,642 Florence-Firestone 6,402 Hawthorne 6,127 North Hills 5,965 Sun Valley 5,850 Canoga Park 5,788 South Whittier 5,611 Bell Gardens 5,606 Carson 5,505 Burbank 5,285 Central 5,187 Westlake 5,172 Wilmington 5,153 Melrose 5,125 South Park 5,053 90813: Long Beach 4,980 Watts 4,957 Vermont Vista 4,903 Harvard Park 4,677 Pico-Union 4,613 Northridge 4,607 Wholesale District 4,579 La Puente 4,578 Arleta 4,492 Bell 4,400 San Pedro 4,390 Lakewood 4,303 Alhambra 4,241 Winnetka 4,233 Covina 4,230 Azusa 4,183 El Sereno 4,098 Torrance 4,056 Century Palms/Cove 4,055 Athens-Westmont 4,021 Willowbrook 3,992 Exposition Park 3,984 Granada Hills 3,981 Gardena 3,851 Highland Park 3,732 90806: Long Beach 3,702 Maywood 3,559 Sherman Oaks 3,552 Lake Balboa 3,417 Hollywood 3,392 Lincoln Heights 3,391 Hacienda Heights 3,343 Temple-Beaudry 3,308 Koreatown 3,297 San Fernando 3,260 Wilshire Center 3,259 Cudahy 3,122 Glendora 3,077 Monterey Park 3,001 Harbor Gateway 2,962 Castaic 2,955 West Whittier/Los Nietos 2,925 Rosemead 2,923 Woodland Hills 2,876 90810: Long Beach 2,873 Santa Monica 2,806 Mission Hills 2,784 90804: Long Beach 2,757 La Mirada 2,725 West Adams 2,586 Green Meadows 2,519 90802: Long Beach 2,460 Downtown 2,445 Valinda 2,439 Valley Glen 2,439 San Jose Hills 2,367 Eagle Rock 2,337 University Park 2,321 South El Monte 2,299 Rowland Heights 2,274 Chatsworth 2,257 Hyde Park 2,236 Lennox 2,136 Encino 2,115 Glassell Park 2,099 Lawndale 2,088 Altadena 2,080 Tarzana 2,038 Silver Lake 2,032 East Hollywood 2,020 Monrovia 1,999 Walnut Park 1,969 Diamond Bar 1,966 San Gabriel 1,954 San Dimas 1,920 Vermont Knolls 1,894 East Rancho Dominguez 1,845 Mt. Washington 1,839 West Hills 1,830 Santa Fe Springs 1,789 90815: Long Beach 1,766 Cerritos 1,766 La Verne 1,754 Bassett 1,732 Baldwin Hills 1,725 Commerce 1,710 90807: Long Beach 1,687 Beverly Hills 1,661 Arcadia 1,658 Tujunga 1,640 Harvard Heights 1,612 90808: Long Beach 1,607 Little Bangladesh 1,599 Redondo Beach 1,587 Lakeview Terrace 1,537 Unincorporated - Azusa 1,537 Temple City 1,519 Porter Ranch 1,508 Unincorporated - Covina 1,506 Hawaiian Gardens 1,465 Palms 1,465 Claremont 1,450 West Los Angeles 1,449 Duarte 1,446 West Hollywood 1,445 Harbor City 1,417 Sunland 1,381 Westwood 1,379 Historic Filipinotown 1,362 Westchester 1,360 Del Rey 1,298 Valley Village 1,291 Artesia 1,282 Culver City 1,281 West Carson 1,245 90803: Long Beach 1,178 Mar Vista 1,164 West Puente Valley 1,147 Walnut 1,086 Northeast San Gabriel 1,056 Cloverdale/Cochran 1,037 Alsace 1,016 Venice 1,004 Lake Los Angeles 998 Covina (Charter Oak) 983 Leimert Park 970 Country Club Park 968 Hollywood Hills 943 Vermont Square 940 Crenshaw District 932 Brentwood 916 Figueroa Park Square 902 Echo Park 858 South Pasadena 853 Studio City 846 90814: Long Beach 827 Elysian Valley 823 Manhattan Beach 813 Atwater Village 802 Rancho Palos Verdes 791 Gramercy Place 788 Adams-Normandie 766 Lomita 766 Jefferson Park 763 Athens Village 762 Little Armenia 762 Mid-city 746 Avocado Heights 741 North Whittier 738 Quartz Hill 727 Calabasas 719 Signal Hill 710 Victoria Park 685 Los Feliz 657 Hancock Park 646 Stevenson Ranch 626 Carthay 624 Crestview 618 La Crescenta-Montrose 614 Agoura Hills 593 Unincorporated - Duarte 593 Hermosa Beach 592 South San Gabriel 584 Sun Village 580 Manchester Square 563 Miracle Mile 561 Beverlywood 530 Thai Town 508 Canyon Country 505 Chinatown 477 Pacific Palisades 476 El Camino Village 474 La Canada Flintridge 472 South Carthay 446 Cadillac-Corning 442 View Park/Windsor Hills 439 Beverly Crest 408 St Elmo Village 393 Reseda Ranch 392 El Segundo 390 Longwood 382 Park La Brea 365 Wellington Square 362 Century City 361 Unincorporated - Arcadia 346 Playa Vista 342 Lafayette Square 341 Wiseburn 329 Elysian Park 325 East La Mirada 324 Littlerock/Pearblossom 319 Littlerock 316 Toluca Lake 311 Rosewood/West Rancho Dominguez 308 Santa Monica Mountains 308 Sierra Madre 301 East Whittier 288 Acton 271 Cheviot Hills 264 Little Tokyo 255 San Marino 247 Ladera Heights 245 Rancho Dominguez 243 Bel Air 239 Shadow Hills 238 Exposition 234 Unincorporated - Monrovia 234 Unincorporated - South El Monte 233 Palos Verdes Estates 229 Malibu 223 Desert View Highlands 221 Marina del Rey 221 Rancho Park 217 Unincorporated - Hawthorne 209 Unincorporated - Whittier 197 Del Aire 195 Val Verde 188 Irwindale 179 Angelino Heights 178 White Fence Farms 169 University Hills 166 Reynier Village 157 East Pasadena 154 La Rambla 147 Rolling Hills Estates 147 Regent Square 142 View Heights 142 Sunrise Village 140 Unincorporated - West LA 139 Agua Dulce 137 Kagel/Lopez Canyons 130 Faircrest Heights 127 Harbor Pines 108 Industry 106 Valencia 105 Unincorporated - La Verne 104 Pellissier Village 103 Anaverde 101 Del Sur 101 Rosewood/East Gardena 101 West Rancho Dominguez 101 Marina Peninsula 94 Santa Catalina Island 90 Saugus 90 La Habra Heights 88 North Lancaster 88 Palisades Highlands 88 Rosewood 87 Mandeville Canyon 81 Lake Manor 78 Westlake Village 76 Toluca Terrace 75 Leona Valley 73 Littlerock/Juniper Hills 72 Toluca Woods 69 Playa Del Rey 68 Pearblossom/Llano 66 Vernon 65 Unincorporated - Palmdale 62 Newhall 57 Southeast Antelope Valley 55 Roosevelt 53 Twin Lakes/Oat Mountain 53 Unincorporated - Glendora 48 Unincorporated - Cerritos 46 Hidden Hills 43 Unincorporated - Pomona 43 Elizabeth Lake 41 Unincorporated - Claremont 35 Bradbury 32 Westhills 30 Bouquet Canyon 26 Hi Vista 26 Rolling Hills 26 Saugus/Canyon Country 26 San Pasqual 25 Llano 24 East Covina 23 Lake Hughes 23 Sycamore Square 23 Unincorporated - Angeles National Forest 19 West Antelope Valley 19 Westfield/Academy Hills 19 Brookside 18 Palos Verdes Peninsula 18 Unincorporated - Del Rey 16 Unincorporated - El Monte 16 Unincorporated - Bradbury 14 South Antelope Valley 13 Unincorporated - La Habra Heights 11 East Lancaster 10 Sand Canyon 10 Whittier Narrows 8 San Francisquito Canyon/Bouquet Canyon 7 Avalon 6 Padua Hills 6 Angeles National Forest 4 Franklin Canyon 1 West Chatsworth 1 Show less Hospitals and patients Stay-at-home orders aim to slow the virus in hope of preventing hospitals from being overrun. To keep tabs on available beds, officials watch out for rapid increases in the number of patients. There are now 20,540 hospital patients statewide with a confirmed case, a change of 28% from two weeks ago. ConfirmedSuspectedBoth Intensive care and other hospitalized patients AprilJuneAug.Oct.Dec.05,00010,00015,00020,000 California Department of Public Health Confirmed patients County ICU Other Total Los Angeles » 1,601 6,026 7,627 Orange » 501 1,596 2,097 San Bernardino » 345 1,360 1,705 Riverside » 308 1,208 1,516 San Diego » 381 1,106 1,487 Santa Clara » 165 522 687 Fresno » 148 458 606 Sacramento » 103 364 467 Alameda » 115 339 454 Kern » 78 301 379 Ventura » 71 288 359 Stanislaus » 63 252 315 San Joaquin » 83 226 309 Contra Costa » 65 189 254 Tulare » 25 200 225 San Francisco » 55 152 207 Monterey » 35 154 189 Placer » 25 163 188 Imperial » 52 115 167 San Mateo » 40 122 162 Solano » 38 111 149 Santa Barbara » 36 101 137 Sonoma » 19 71 90 Kings » 9 70 79 Santa Cruz » 17 61 78 Butte » 11 63 74 Yuba » 17 52 69 San Luis Obispo » 15 47 62 Merced » 18 39 57 Madera » 9 41 50 Marin » 7 31 38 Shasta » 6 29 35 El Dorado » 14 19 33 Napa » 16 12 28 Yolo » 8 17 25 Tehama » 1 20 21 San Benito » 3 11 14 Mendocino » 2 11 13 Glenn » 0 11 11 Lake » 4 7 11 Amador » 3 7 10 Nevada » 5 5 10 Tuolumne » 2 7 9 Inyo » 1 6 7 Lassen » 0 6 6 Colusa » 0 5 5 Siskiyou » 2 3 5 Del Norte » 2 2 4 Humboldt » 1 3 4 Calaveras » 0 3 3 Plumas » 0 2 2 Modoc » 0 1 1 Sutter » 0 0 0 Mono » 0 0 0 Trinity » 0 0 0 Mariposa » 0 0 0 Show less Officials also closely monitor the number of beds open in intensive-care units. The latest data show that there are 1,291 available statewide. Available ICU beds Aug.Sept.Oct.Nov.Dec.05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5001,291Dec. 31 California Department of Public Health Officials have organized the state’s counties into five regions. If a region’s available percentage of intensive-care beds falls below 15%, a stay-at-home order is issued. The number is adjusted to ensure that some beds remain open for patients who don’t have COVID-19. Four regions currently fail. Available ICU beds by region 01530Dec.3Jan.1Bay AreaBay Area6.3%6.3% Greater SacramentoGreater Sacramento11.1%11.1% Northern CaliforniaNorthern California33.3%33.3% San Joaquin ValleySan Joaquin Valley0.0%0.0% Southern CaliforniaSouthern California0.0%0.0% Vaccines California has received about 1.76 million doses of coronavirus vaccine. The first inoculations are being administered to healthcare workers who face the greatest exposure to the virus and residents of long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes. As of Dec. 31, 335,983 people have received the shot. Officials are still drafting a plan on how to roll out the vaccine beyond the initial group. It is unclear when essential workers and other Californians will have access. Phase 1 Healthcare workers and long-term care residents Doctors and nurses on the front lines are now receiving shots. Other healthcare workers and nursing homes come next in this step. Phase 2 Essential workers Emergency personnel, teachers and farmworkers are expected to be next in line. There is no start date. Who else will qualify is undecided. Phase 3 Everyone else It’s unclear how long the rest of California’s nearly 40 million residents may wait. Experts say shots may be readily available by late spring or summer. Testing After a fitful start, California has increased coronavirus testing in the state. Over the last week, an average of 284,493 tests have been conducted each day. New tests by day MayJulySept.Nov.0100,000200,000300,000400,0007-dayaverage7-dayaverage California Department of Public Health In the last seven days, about 12.6% of the 1,991,450 tests conducted have returned a positive result. Positive test rate, seven-day average MayJulySept.Nov.0%5%10%15%12.6%Jan. 1 California Department of Public Health Wide disparities in age and race While younger adults make up the majority of positive tests, deaths due to the virus have skewed heavily toward the elderly. Percentage of cases vs. population 0%10%20%30%40%50%80+75-7970-7465-6960-6450-5935-4918-345-170-4 Percentage of deaths vs. population 0%10%20%30%40%50%80+75-7970-7465-6960-6450-5935-4918-345-170-4 There are 1518 cases with an unreported age. California Department of Public Health The state has logged the race of the patient in nearly two-thirds of cases. Latinos and Black people have contracted the virus at a higher rate than white and Asian people. After adjusting for population, Latinos are now 2.6 times more likely to test positive than white people. Cumulative cases by race per 100,000 people JuneAug.Oct.Dec.01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000AsianAsianBlackBlackLatino5,681 casesper 100,000Latino5,681 casesper 100,000OtherOtherWhiteWhite The other category includes Native Americans and people of two or more races. California Department of Public Health One outcome is that among most age groups, and especially younger people, Black people and Latinos are dying more often than other races relative to their share of the population. Percentage of deaths vs. population Age: All 18+ 0-17 18-34 35-49 50-64 65-79 80+ CasesDeaths 0%20%40%60%80%BlackAsianWhiteLatino Race Deaths Deaths Pct. Population Pct. Latino 11,572 47.4% 36.3% White 7,676 31.4% 38.8% Asian 2,946 12.0% 16.5% Black 1,696 6.9% 6.1% Note: There are 295 deaths with an unknown race in this age bracket, 1% of the total. Lives lost to COVID-19 Learn more about those we've lost by reading Times obituaries of Californians who have died from coronavirus. Nursing homes Nursing homes are a tragic focal point of the outbreak. Residents and staff have accounted for 5% the state's coronavirus cases, but 35% of its deaths. CasesDeaths Deaths at nursing homes vs. elsewhere JuneAug.Oct.Dec.05,00010,00015,00020,00025,000 California Department of Public Health Track outbreaks in California nursing homes Follow the data and look up the latest tallies at the hundreds of skilled-nursing and assisted-living facilities across the state. State prisons The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has faced criticism around its handling of recent surge in cases across its 35 facilities in the state. Cumulative casesActive casesDeaths Cumulative cases AprilJuneAug.Oct.Dec.010,00020,00030,00040,00040,002Jan. 1 The data do not include tallies from federal prisons, immigration detention facilities or local jails. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Track outbreaks in California state prisons Follow the data and look up latest outbreaks among inmates and state employees by facility. California in context To date, the United States has recorded 19,963,569 coronavirus cases and 345,675 deaths. In the last week, the country has averaged 186,453 new cases and 2,390 deaths per day. While California — America’s most populous state — has the nation’s top case counts. Home to 12% of the country's population, thus far it has accounted for roughly 12% of cases. New cases in California vs. the rest of the country MarchMayJulySept.Nov.050,000100,000150,000200,000250,000 Johns Hopkins University CSSE, Times survey State Cases Per 100k Last 14 days Per 100k New cases FewerMore California 2,296,102 5,865.1 545,011 1,392.2 Mar 1Dec 31 Texas 1,766,307 6,334.2 214,558 769.4 Florida 1,323,315 6,424.4 154,832 751.7 New York 978,783 4,989.1 153,724 783.6 Pennsylvania 645,390 5,045.6 110,442 863.4 Ohio 700,380 6,016 104,202 895.1 Georgia 666,452 6,472 98,056 952.2 Tennessee 586,802 8,822.6 93,572 1,406.9 Arizona 520,207 7,488.6 85,171 1,226.1 Illinois 963,389 7,513.9 83,961 654.8 North Carolina 539,545 5,312.8 81,885 806.3 Massachusetts 375,178 5,492.9 65,931 965.3 Indiana 511,485 7,706.1 64,295 968.7 New Jersey 477,360 5,374.6 58,030 653.4 Virginia 349,584 4,154.9 53,491 635.8 Alabama 361,226 7,425.5 50,891 1,046.1 South Carolina 307,507 6,204.8 44,733 902.6 Oklahoma 290,936 7,425.4 42,732 1,090.6 Michigan 528,621 5,308.8 41,265 414.4 Wisconsin 520,438 9,006.6 37,995 657.5 Missouri 403,405 6,624 37,727 619.5 Louisiana 315,275 6,760.3 35,954 770.9 Colorado 334,097 6,040.3 33,683 609 Utah 276,612 9,083.1 32,694 1,073.6 Maryland 276,662 4,608.4 32,678 544.3 Kentucky 265,261 5,974.1 31,241 703.6 Arkansas 225,138 7,528 30,595 1,023 Washington 246,752 3,382.8 29,547 405.1 Nevada 224,731 7,688.8 28,352 970 Mississippi 215,811 7,220.7 27,907 933.7 Kansas 225,440 7,750.3 27,509 945.7 Minnesota 415,302 7,513.6 26,131 472.8 Connecticut 185,708 5,185.2 25,606 715 Iowa 281,712 8,993.2 19,502 622.6 West Virginia 85,334 4,665.5 16,849 921.2 New Mexico 142,864 6,827.6 16,819 803.8 Oregon 113,909 2,790.6 14,973 366.8 Idaho 141,077 8,358.6 14,199 841.3 Nebraska 166,798 8,756.9 13,398 703.4 Puerto Rico 76,291 2,252.5 11,540 340.7 Rhode Island 87,949 8,323.7 10,659 1,008.8 New Hampshire 44,028 3,276.8 9,764 726.7 Delaware 57,456 6,051.2 8,688 915 Maine 24,201 1,815.8 6,300 472.7 Montana 81,555 7,828.8 6,072 582.9 South Dakota 99,164 11,473.5 5,967 690.4 Alaska 46,986 6,362.2 4,130 559.2 Wyoming 44,409 7,632.6 3,816 655.9 North Dakota 92,495 12,296.6 3,432 456.3 District of Columbia 28,983 4,234.2 3,153 460.6 Hawaii 21,745 1,529.2 1,678 118 Vermont 7,412 1,186 1,263 202.1 Show less So far, California has accounted for 8% of deaths nationwide. It still trails behind New York, where deaths surged in the early days of the pandemic. New deaths in California vs. the rest of the country MarchMayJulySept.Nov.01,0002,0003,0004,000 Johns Hopkins University CSSE, Times survey State Deaths Per 100k Last 14 days Per 100k New deaths FewerMore California 25,984 66.4 3,808 9.7 Mar 1Dec 31 Texas 27,944 100.2 2,767 9.9 Pennsylvania 15,947 124.7 2,618 20.5 Illinois 17,978 140.2 1,993 15.5 New York 37,983 193.6 1,916 9.8 Florida 21,673 105.2 1,368 6.6 Michigan 13,018 130.7 1,217 12.2 Arizona 8,864 127.6 1,187 17.1 Indiana 8,263 124.5 1,083 16.3 Ohio 8,962 77 1,068 9.2 Tennessee 6,907 103.8 1,062 16 New Jersey 19,042 214.4 962 10.8 Massachusetts 12,423 181.9 865 12.7 Missouri 5,694 93.5 743 12.2 North Carolina 6,748 66.4 683 6.7 Wisconsin 5,242 90.7 681 11.8 Minnesota 5,382 97.4 665 12 Georgia 10,934 106.2 640 6.2 Colorado 4,814 87 588 10.6 Maryland 5,895 98.2 576 9.6 Alabama 4,827 99.2 573 11.8 Arkansas 3,676 122.9 564 18.9 Louisiana 7,488 160.6 524 11.2 Kansas 2,736 94.1 483 16.6 Virginia 5,032 59.8 479 5.7 Mississippi 4,787 160.2 467 15.6 South Carolina 5,296 106.9 453 9.1 Nevada 3,122 106.8 451 15.4 Connecticut 5,995 167.4 443 12.4 Iowa 3,891 124.2 441 14.1 New Mexico 2,477 118.4 374 17.9 Oklahoma 2,489 63.5 345 8.8 Washington 3,461 47.4 344 4.7 Kentucky 2,623 59.1 307 6.9 West Virginia 1,338 73.2 267 14.6 Nebraska 1,651 86.7 198 10.4 Oregon 1,477 36.2 194 4.8 South Dakota 1,488 172.2 187 21.6 Puerto Rico 1,503 44.4 180 5.3 Idaho 1,436 85.1 177 10.5 Rhode Island 1,777 168.2 175 16.6 Utah 1,269 41.7 143 4.7 New Hampshire 759 56.5 130 9.7 Montana 961 92.3 112 10.8 North Dakota 1,292 171.8 88 11.7 Wyoming 438 75.3 87 15 Delaware 926 97.5 81 8.5 Maine 347 26 71 5.3 District of Columbia 786 114.8 61 8.9 Vermont 136 21.8 31 5 Alaska 206 27.9 23 3.1 Hawaii 288 20.3 8 0.6 Show less Tracking the coronavirus California counties Alameda Alpine Amador Butte Calaveras Colusa Contra Costa Del Norte El Dorado Fresno Glenn Humboldt Imperial Inyo Kern Kings Lake Lassen Los Angeles Madera Marin Mariposa Mendocino Merced Modoc Mono Monterey Napa Nevada Orange Placer Plumas Riverside Sacramento San Benito San Bernardino San Diego San Francisco San Joaquin San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Barbara Santa Clara Santa Cruz Shasta Sierra Siskiyou Solano Sonoma Stanislaus Sutter Tehama Trinity Tulare Tuolumne Ventura Yolo Yuba Other trackers Housing homeless people Nursing homes State prisons Following the curve Unemployment and economic fallout Which counties are open Which beaches are closed Lives lost Frequently asked questions More coverage Coronavirus symptoms How coronavirus spreads Get our newsletter About the numbers This page was created by Swetha Kannan, Casey Miller, Sean Greene, Lorena Iñiguez Elebee, Rong-Gong Lin II, Ryan Murphy, Melody Gutierrez, Priya Krishnakumar, Sandhya Kambhampati, Maloy Moore, Jennifer Lu, Aida Ylanan, Vanessa Martínez, Ryan Menezes, Thomas Suh Lauder, Andrea Roberson, Ben Poston, Nicole Santa Cruz, Iris Lee, Rahul Mukherjee, Jaclyn Cosgrove, Anthony Pesce, Paul Duginski and Phi Do. State and county totals come from an ongoing Times survey of California’s 58 county health agencies as well as the three run by cities. Those figures are ahead of the totals periodically released by the state’s Department of Public Health. State officials acknowledge that their tallies lag behind the updates posted by local agencies throughout the day and do not dispute The Times’ method. Data on hospitalizations, tests, demographics and reopening plans come from the state health department. Nursing home totals include skilled-nursing facilities tracked by the state public health department, as well as assisted-living facilities monitored by the California Department of Social Services. Data from other states, Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico are collected by researchers at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering. Counties are organized into regions using the groupings developed by the state health department. The Times database is available to the public on Github, a popular website for hosting data and computer code. The files will be updated daily at github.com/datadesk/california-coronavirus-data. The data collection effort is done in partnership with journalists at the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Diego Union-Tribune, KQED, KPCC, CapRadio, Calmatters and Stanford’s Big Local News. Learn more about The Times count by reading this list of frequently asked questions or by reading this interview with members of our team. If you see information here that you believe is incorrect or out of date, please contact Data and Graphics Editor Ben Welsh at [email protected]. Change log Dec. 23 State prison data added to county pages and overview page. ICU totals at local hospitals added to county pages. Dec. 14 New charts were added ranking the rate of new cases in the state’s five regions over the last seven days. Dec. 12 New charts were added plotting the ICU capacity in the state’s five region over time. Dec. 3 The state’s new ICU availability metric were added to county reopening profiles. Nov. 13 A chart tracking changes in tier assignments was added to the reopenings tracker. Nov. 9 Per-capita totals for city-level data added to some county pages. Oct. 19 Maps were added for case counts in Del Norte, Lake, Siskiyou, Trinity counties. Oct. 17 The hotspots section now offers a ranking of counties by the total number of cases and deaths in the past week. Oct. 9 Charts plotting the daily trend in cities and regions added to most county pages. Oct. 4 Charts plotting how each area stacks up against the state’s reopening benchmarks added to county pages. Oct. 1 City-level totals added for Shasta County. Sept. 27 Totals for skilled-nursing facilities are now drawn from the state's open data portal, which is promoted as the most comprehensive and up-to-date source. Sept. 26 The hotspots section now offers a ranking of counties by deaths per 100,000 residents over the last seven days. Sept. 22 Nursing home lists moved to a new page focused on skilled-nursing and assisted-living facilities. Sept. 13 The logarithmic curves plotting the rate of growth in each state were replaced. Instead, stacked-bar charts compare California's case and death counts against the rest of the nation. Sept. 12 The county map is now exclusively focused on cumulative totals and starts off by displaying grand totals per 100,000 residents. Sept. 11 The logarithmic curves plotting the rate of growth in each county were replaced. Instead, after adjusting for population, counties are now ranked by the number new cases announced in the past week. The reopening map has been removed and can be found by visiting our more complete county reopening tracker. https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-cases-tracking-outbreak/

Variant COVID-19 strain found in San Bernardino County 01/01/2021 by Rhiannon Voest Big Bear News – Big Bear Valley, CA – The San Bernardino County Department of Public Health was notified by the California Department of Public Health today that two cases of the more contagious B117 strain of the novel coronavirus have been detected in San Bernardino County. The variant strain is currently prevalent in London and southeast England and the detection of the B117 strain is not unexpected. Multiple variants of the virus that cause COVID-19 have been documented in the United States and globally during this pandemic. These cases were among results collected from members of one Big Bear-area household on Dec. 20. One member of the household had contact with a traveler who returned from the United Kingdom on Dec. 11 and began showing symptoms on Dec. 14. “Based on the information currently available, we know that the B117 variant strain seems to spread more easily and quickly,” said Dr. Michael Sequeira, County Health Officer. “Therefore, following all safe practices is more important than ever.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continues to recommend that travelers should avoid all travel to high-risk areas, including the United Kingdom: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/map-and-travel-notices.html. Currently, there is no evidence that these variants cause more severe illness or increased risk of death and no indication that the vaccines are less effective on this strain. Please visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for more information on New COVID-19 Variants.

These cases were among results collected from members of one Big Bear-area household on Dec. 20. One member of the household had contact with a traveler who returned from the United Kingdom on Dec. 11 and began showing symptoms on Dec. 14. “Based on the information currently available, we know that the B117 variant strain seems to spread more easily and quickly,” said Dr. Michael Sequeira, County Health Officer. “Therefore, following all safe practices is more important than ever.” https://kbhr933.com/big-bear-news-kbhr-93-3-102-5/variant-covid-19-strain-found-in-san-bernardino-county/

USA/CA-CDPH-UC302/2020 12/20 matched UK variant with 3 AAs deleted in Spike protein, 3 AAs deleted in NSP6 and Q27 stop codon in NS8. map update https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/1/edit?mid=1aQDSL2LwQFbuoCAg_nIOPK8D-LIJ5MYd&ll=34.26637054404095%2C-116.8538628266802&z=11

USA/CA-CDPH-UC301/2020 12/20 matched UK variant with 3 AAs deleted in Spike protein, 3 AAs deleted in NSP6 and Q27 stop codon in NS8. map update https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/1/edit?mid=1aQDSL2LwQFbuoCAg_nIOPK8D-LIJ5MYd&ll=34.26637054404095%2C-116.8538628266802&z=11

UCSF has released (at GISAID) two UK Variant, B.1.1.7, COVID sequences, USA/CA-CDPH-UC301/2020 & USA/CA-CDPH-UC302/2020 collected Dec 20 in San Bernardino County.

4,659 Douglas 2,092 Lancaster 1,522 Sarpy 334 Dodge 297 Hall 256 Cass 226 Buffalo 186 Lincoln 177 Madison 175 Saunders 171 Dawson 161 Adams 130 Gage 124 Dakota 123 Washington 111 Platte 108 Scotts Bluff 107 Seward 94 Cuming 93 Otoe 93 Red Willow 81 Cheyenne 74 Richardson 72 Johnson 70 Phelps 66 Chase 63 Holt 62 Saline 61 Thurston 60 York 60 Keith 54 Colfax 50 Nemaha 49 Knox 49 Merrick 48 Clay 44 Box Butte 42 Custer 40 Hamilton 40 Thayer 37 Howard 36 Wayne 34 Kimball 34 Dixon 33 Jefferson 33 Kearney 33 Pierce 31 Sheridan 29 Perkins 29 Boone 27 Dawes 25 Franklin 23 Butler 23 Furnas 23 Stanton 22 Antelope 19 Frontier 19 Gosper 18 Hitchcock 17 Burt 16 Cedar 14 Morrill 13 Nuckolls 13 Valley 13 Polk 12 Harlan 12 Dundy 12 Fillmore 10 Logan 9 Nance 9 Pawnee 9 Cherry 7 Brown 7 Webster 6 Garden 5 Hayes 5 Greeley 4 Garfield 4 Deuel 2 Boyd 2 Banner 2 Blaine 2 Loup 2 McPherson 2 Wheeler 2 Sherman 2 Sioux 2 Thomas 1 Rock 1 Hooker 1 Arthur 0 Keya Paha https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/ece0db09da4d4ca68252c3967aa1e9dd 0 Grant

Arkansas (1,324 Total Positive Cases) Ashley (1,291 Total Positive Cases) Baxter (2,114 Total Positive Cases) Benton (18,355 Total Positive Cases) Boone (2,593 Total Positive Cases) Bradley (957 Total Positive Cases) Calhoun (239 Total Positive Cases) Carroll (2,110 Total Positive Cases) Chicot (1,418 Total Positive Cases) Clark (1,388 Total Positive Cases) Clay (1,332 Total Positive Cases) Cleburne (1,286 Total Positive Cases) Cleveland (577 Total Positive Cases) Columbia (1,591 Total Positive Cases) Conway (1,343 Total Positive Cases) Craighead (10,176 Total Positive Cases) Crawford (4,542 Total Positive Cases) Crittenden (4,360 Total Positive Cases) Cross (1,424 Total Positive Cases) Dallas (490 Total Positive Cases) Desha (967 Total Positive Cases) Drew (1,463 Total Positive Cases) Faulkner (7,817 Total Positive Cases) Franklin (1,111 Total Positive Cases) Fulton (895 Total Positive Cases) Garland (5,898 Total Positive Cases) Grant (1,101 Total Positive Cases) Greene (4,463 Total Positive Cases) Hempstead (1,240 Total Positive Cases) Hot Spring (3,661 Total Positive Cases) Howard (1,113 Total Positive Cases) Independence (2,809 Total Positive Cases) Izard (1,334 Total Positive Cases) Jackson (2,831 Total Positive Cases) Jefferson (6,797 Total Positive Cases) Johnson (1,885 Total Positive Cases) Lafayette (345 Total Positive Cases) Lawrence (1,587 Total Positive Cases) Lee (1,449 Total Positive Cases) Lincoln (2,828 Total Positive Cases) Little River (827 Total Positive Cases) Logan (1,453 Total Positive Cases) Lonoke (4,235 Total Positive Cases) Madison (1,048 Total Positive Cases) Marion (655 Total Positive Cases) Miller (2,783 Total Positive Cases) Missing County Info (2,828 Total Positive Cases) Mississippi (4,411 Total Positive Cases) Monroe (486 Total Positive Cases) Montgomery (508 Total Positive Cases) Nevada (598 Total Positive Cases) Newton (557 Total Positive Cases) Ouachita (1,393 Total Positive Cases) Perry (446 Total Positive Cases) Phillips (1,272 Total Positive Cases) Pike (701 Total Positive Cases) Poinsett (2,418 Total Positive Cases) Polk (1,275 Total Positive Cases) Pope (5,584 Total Positive Cases) Prairie (554 Total Positive Cases) Pulaski (25,209 Total Positive Cases) Randolph (1,473 Total Positive Cases) Saline (7,751 Total Positive Cases) Scott (611 Total Positive Cases) Searcy (510 Total Positive Cases) Sebastian (9,788 Total Positive Cases) Sevier (2,096 Total Positive Cases) Sharp (1,158 Total Positive Cases) St. Francis (2,758 Total Positive Cases) Stone (770 Total Positive Cases) Union (2,523 Total Positive Cases) Van Buren (771 Total Positive Cases) Washington (21,805 Total Positive Cases) White (4,893 Total Positive Cases) Woodruff (367 Total Positive Cases) Yell (2,423 Total Positive Cases) https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/c2ef4a4fcbe5458fbf2e48a21e4fece9

https://health.hawaii.gov/coronavirusdisease2019/

https://dhhr.wv.gov/COVID-19/Pages/default.aspx

https://cvprovider.nmhealth.org/public-dashboard.html

Total Positive Cases 58,064618.7 per 10,000 people Confirmed 55,670 Probable 2,394 Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities 1,922 Positive Cases by County New Castle County 33,433 Kent County 9,329 Sussex County 15,166 Unknown 136 Deaths in State of Delaware Total Deaths 9307.7 per 10,000 people Confirmed 828 Probable 102 Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities 500 https://myhealthycommunity.dhss.delaware.gov/locations/state

December 31, 2020: Total Overall Number of Tests: 904,302* Total Number of DC Residents Tested: 358,551* Total Positives: 29,252 Total Lives Lost: 788 Cleared from Isolation: 20,941 https://coronavirus.dc.gov/data

https://app.powerbigov.us/view?r=eyJrIjoiMjA2ZThiOWUtM2FlNS00MGY5LWFmYjUtNmQwNTQ3Nzg5N2I2IiwidCI6ImU0YTM0MGU2LWI4OWUtNGU2OC04ZWFhLTE1NDRkMjcwMzk4MCJ9

https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/cases.htm

High Cases and Incidence Map of Mississippi counties by 7-day incidence Table of counties ranked by weekly cases and incidence Cumulative Cases and Deaths by County Totals of all reported COVID-19 cases for 2020, including those in long-term care (LTC) facilities. The numbers in this table are provisional. County case numbers and deaths may change as investigation finds new or additional information. The data provided below is the most current available. County Total Cases Total Deaths Total LTC Facility Cases Total LTC Facility Deaths Adams 1807 58 72 15 Alcorn 2235 40 120 18 Amite 869 23 54 7 Attala 1751 51 167 32 Benton 683 21 45 10 Bolivar 3450 95 223 30 Calhoun 1184 17 25 4 Carroll 936 18 46 9 Chickasaw 1607 37 51 15 Choctaw 526 10 1 0 Claiborne 723 20 43 9 Clarke 1206 58 108 28 Clay 1349 30 20 3 Coahoma 1971 52 127 11 Copiah 2195 45 73 9 Covington 1858 67 133 39 De Soto 14885 139 107 20 Forrest 5292 102 215 44 Franklin 596 9 40 1 George 1740 35 48 7 Greene 996 25 52 6 Grenada 1978 62 146 31 Hancock 2074 55 70 14 Harrison 10843 157 470 57 Hinds 14118 272 696 107 Holmes 1596 65 103 20 Humphreys 739 22 33 8 Issaquena 152 4 0 0 Itawamba 2322 51 123 22 Jackson 8820 159 215 26 Jasper 1467 25 35 1 Jefferson 467 14 22 3 Jefferson Davis 766 24 8 1 Jones 5288 97 206 39 Kemper 666 19 44 9 Lafayette 4289 84 185 50 Lamar 4162 60 47 13 Lauderdale 4992 171 378 88 Lawrence 919 16 27 2 Leake 2069 57 81 12 Lee 7758 118 206 40 Leflore 2664 101 221 48 Lincoln 2592 79 169 36 Lowndes 4458 92 201 41 Madison 7294 136 330 60 Marion 1775 63 155 22 Marshall 2929 63 62 15 Monroe 3061 89 179 53 Montgomery 994 31 54 9 Neshoba 3032 142 191 55 Newton 1631 34 83 11 Noxubee 959 20 31 4 Oktibbeha 3453 76 206 34 Panola 3236 71 103 13 Pearl River 2633 81 155 31 Perry 890 30 20 7 Pike 2252 71 118 32 Pontotoc 3196 42 21 3 Prentiss 2129 42 99 15 Quitman 606 7 0 0 Rankin 8957 168 329 48 Scott 2146 40 37 4 Sharkey 390 17 43 8 Simpson 2064 64 152 19 Smith 1036 20 55 8 Stone 1202 18 78 9 Sunflower 2435 61 90 15 Tallahatchie 1240 33 43 7 Tate 2414 56 80 19 Tippah 2026 40 80 5 Tishomingo 1596 53 101 27 Tunica 759 19 15 2 Union 2865 42 105 16 Walthall 1012 34 67 13 Warren 2773 79 164 37 Washington 4322 116 187 39 Wayne 1698 27 68 11 Webster 789 18 57 11 Wilkinson 533 23 24 5 Winston 1854 51 105 28 Yalobusha 1014 33 81 22 Yazoo 2133 50 138 17 Total 218,386 4,816 9,362 1,719 Case Classifications Mississippi investigates and reports both probable and confirmed cases and deaths according to the CSTE case definition. Confirmed Probable Total Cases 148,911 69,475 218,386 Deaths 3,834 982 4,816 Confirmed cases and deaths are generally determined by positive PCR tests, which detect the presence of ongoing coronavirus infection. Probable cases are those who test positive by other testing methods such as antibody or antigen, and have recent symptoms consistent with COVID-19, indicating a recent infection. Probable deaths are those individuals with a designation of COVID-19 as a cause of death on the death certificate, but where no confirmatory testing was performed. https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,420.html#highcase

There are 424,972 confirmed COVID-19 patients in Missouri, including 6,081 deaths. https://www.kshb.com/news/coronavirus/covid-19-case-tracker-where-we-stand-in-mo-ks-nationwide Adair County 1,764 11 Andrew County 1,665 16 Atchison County 260 5 Audrain County 1,824 36 Barry County 2,396 44 Barton County 776 8 Bates County 845 12 Benton County 1,203 16 Bollinger County 1,076 13 Boone County 13,835 58 Buchanan County 6,213 132 Butler County 3,566 32 Caldwell County 553 5 Callaway County 3,817 30 Camden County 3,183 63 Cape Girardeau County 6,533 109 Carroll County 661 18 Carter County 379 6 Cass County 5,631 55 Cedar County 529 8 Chariton County 337 3 Christian County 5,599 49 Clark County 376 5 Clay County 7,108 98 Clinton County 1,272 60 Cole County 7,668 90 Cooper County 1,502 20 Crawford County 1,731 19 Dade County 362 9 Dallas County 707 18 Daviess County 470 9 DeKalb County 784 19 Dent County 710 8 Douglas County 631 19 Dunklin County 2,670 18 Franklin County 6,918 113 Gasconade County 689 29 Gentry County 614 16 Greene County 21,467 297 Grundy County 689 23 Harrison County 637 10 Henry County 1,453 22 Hickory County 435 9 Holt County 433 15 Howard County 623 3 Howell County 2,343 37 Iron County 411 1 Jackson County 23,679 245 Jasper County 11,716 195 Jefferson County 16,795 134 Johnson County 3,658 31 Knox County 151 2 Laclede County 2,515 46 Lafayette County 2,092 40 Lawrence County 2,346 52 Lewis County 549 3 Lincoln County 3,561 37 Linn County 409 9 Livingston County 1,050 24 McDonald County 2,013 27 Macon County 932 10 Madison County 1,215 10 Maries County 469 6 Marion County 2,360 24 Mercer County 133 1 Miller County 2,044 41 Mississippi County 1,420 26 Moniteau County 1,677 19 Monroe County 522 5 Montgomery County 504 9 Morgan County 1,458 24 New Madrid County 1,826 31 Newton County 4,105 66 Nodaway County 2,348 19 Oregon County 542 3 Osage County 1,206 8 Ozark County 382 4 Pemiscot County 1,471 30 Perry County 1,954 26 Pettis County 4,186 61 Phelps County 2,525 85 Pike County 1,285 14 Platte County 2,467 26 Polk County 1,842 21 Pulaski County 5,025 34 Putnam County 200 1 Ralls County 667 7 Randolph County 1,611 17 Ray County 1,140 8 Reynolds County 225 2 Ripley County 678 8 St. Charles County 29,669 330 St. Clair County 465 5 Ste. Genevieve County 1,520 8 St. Francois County 6,616 69 St. Louis County 69,480 1,391 Saline County 2,225 44 Schuyler County 203 1 Scotland County 230 3 Scott County 3,450 63 Shannon County 410 9 Shelby County 299 4 Stoddard County 2,681 60 Stone County 1,645 24 Sullivan County 661 10 Taney County 3,827 52 Texas County 1,363 18 Vernon County 1,100 19 Warren County 2,021 19 Washington County 1,798 39 Wayne County 670 6 Webster County 2,462 39 Worth County 122 1 Wright County 1,096 24 St. Louis city 16,186 302 Kansas City 30,472 354 TBD TOTALS 424,972 6081 Note: Positive cases and deaths reported by the Joplin Health Department are included with the Jasper County Health Department figures.

https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/coronavirus/covid-19-in-virginia/

https://covid19.colorado.gov/data

Number of confirmed cases : 280,219 Number of persons tested negative : 2,538,142 Total testing volume : 5,761,534 Daily testing Volume : 53,503 Total vaccinated : 54,060 Number of confirmed deaths : 5,774 Number of probable deaths : 168 Currently hospitalized : 1,734 Acute care : 1,346 Intensive care : 388 Ever hospitalized : 26,819 Released from isolation : 9,358 Cases and Deaths Data Breakdown: Parenthesis = Confirmed death, laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 test result Asterisk = Probable death, death certificate lists COVID-19 as the cause of death but not yet confirmed by a laboratory test NH = Non-Hispanic By County County Cases Deaths Allegany 5,474 (154) 0* Anne Arundel 24,815 (354) 13* Baltimore City 31,911 (690) 21* Baltimore County 39,001 (913) 29* Calvert 2,268 (45) 1* Caroline 1,341 (10) 0* Carroll 5,249 (163) 4* Cecil 3,620 (73) 2* Charles 6,116 (123) 1* Dorchester 1,382 (22) 0* Frederick 11,518 (188) 8* Garrett 1,487 (52) 1* Harford 8,660 (164) 4* Howard 11,363 (175) 6* Kent 742 (25) 2* Montgomery 46,717 (1,086) 43* Prince George's 55,139 (1,062) 27* Queen Anne's 1,701 (27) 1* Somerset 1,816 (22) 0* St. Mary's 3,308 (89) 0* Talbot 1,185 (8) 0* Washington 8,432 (151) 2* Wicomico 4,752 (78) 0* Worcester 2,222 (47) 1* Data not available 0 (53) 2* By Age Range and Gender Age/Gender Cases Deaths 0-9 12,737 (1) 0* 10-19 25,363 (4) 1* 20-29 51,773 (27) 1* 30-39 49,237 (62) 6* 40-49 43,421 (173) 4* 50-59 42,133 (449) 20* 60-69 28,180 (891) 17* 70-79 16,188 (1,464) 30* 80+ 11,187 (2,701) 89* Data not available 0 (2) 0* Female 147,069 (2,800) 82* Male 133,150 (2,974) 86* By Race and Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity Cases Deaths African-American (NH) 81,075 (2,119) 60* Asian (NH) 5,856 (187) 7* White (NH) 91,299 (2,782) 85* Hispanic 48,433 (568) 14* Other (NH) 12,910 (60) 0* Data not available 40,646 (58) 2* https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/